The 206 is exhausted.
That’s in line with the Washington Utilities and Transportation Fee, which handles space codes.
Beginning June 10, when you request a brand new telephone quantity or an additional line within the 206 space, it’s possible you’ll get a quantity with the 564 area code.
We’re plum out of 206. One other milestone within the Seattle area’s development, whether or not residents prefer it or not.
Again in 1947, when 206 was created by the North American Numbering Plan, it served all of Washington.
Its rural cousin, 509, got here alongside in 1957, and the 2 ably related people throughout the Cascade Mountains till 1995. That’s when southwest Washington acquired the 360.
Inhabitants will increase and further telephone strains and units accelerated the adjustments. Solely two years later, the 206 break up once more, creating space codes 425 and 253 to serve the Eastside and the Tacoma space respectively.
And now we’ve the 564. No surprise: Seattle’s inhabitants grew about 21% between 2010 and 2020, a pointy enhance from earlier a long time. Seattle added round 16,800 new residents from July 2023 to July 2024, driving its complete inhabitants to 781,000 individuals, in line with the U.S. Census Bureau.
Seattle has lengthy been often called a spot the place seemingly nobody is from. And regardless of grumblings about visitors, the town has largely prolonged the welcome mat.
Certainly, creating extra housing — regardless of the place, how a lot it prices, its impression on what stays of the city atmosphere — is the order of the day. Simply have a look at the rising themes of this yr’s mayoral and Metropolis Council elections. It’s turning out to be a contest over who desires to spend extra public {dollars} on housing for the million individuals anticipated to name this place house in 2050.
However if you name the newcomers, remember to use 564. As a result of the 206 is exhausted.
If you want to share your ideas, please submit a Letter to the Editor of not more than 200 phrases to be thought-about for publication in our Opinion part. Ship to: letters@seattletimes.com
