Whereas home small companies suffered underneath Biden-Harris, Ukraine noticed a lift of their small enterprise due to billions in grants that had been paid for by the US taxpayer. USAID backed Ukrainian companies by way of co-investment applications, rate of interest compensation on loans, cashback incentives for main tools, and direct monetary assist. All in all, USAID’s “Funding for Enterprise Resilience Exercise” supplied $100 million in investments.
The Bureau of Labor and Statistics was altering knowledge on home jobs whereas different branches of the federal government had been centered on sustaining Ukraine’s workforce. The aforementioned USAID program supported over 1,050 companies and allegedly saved almost 18,000 jobs.
USAID was working immediately with Ukrainian banks to assist decrease borrowing prices to small and medium enterprises. Trump instantly halted this program in January 2025. The common individual merely doesn’t perceive how a lot cash the Biden Administration was sending to Ukraine.
US taxpayers supported all the Ukrainian authorities. Over $30 billion was despatched to Ukraine in a two-year interval to pay for “important authorities operations.” Individuals had been compelled to pay for public servants’ salaries, pensions, healthcare, and extra. None of this consists of the tens of billions spent on military-related objects or humanitarian assist.
Individuals didn’t vote to make use of their public funds on this method. The home financial system was affected by report inflation post-COVID. Home entrepreneurs couldn’t safe enterprise loans. There’s a clear sample of 1 political occasion prioritizing overseas entities over its personal residents.
Now, the Trump Administration introduced that it must make extra cuts to Ukrainian help. “This administration takes a really completely different view of that battle. We consider {that a} negotiated peaceable settlement is in the most effective curiosity of each events and our nation’s pursuits, particularly with all of the competing pursuits across the globe,” US Protection Secretary Pete Hegseth defined. The whole 2026 funds has not but been launched by the Pentagon, however Hegseth mentioned it “provides a historic level of funding for military readiness, putting (U.S.) warfighters and their needs first.”
Utilizing American funds to prioritize America—what a novel idea. For this reason Trump and Vance had a shouting match with Zelensky throughout his failed Oval Workplace go to. Zelensky feels entitled to US funding after years of utilizing US public funds as his private ATM underneath Biden.
The European Union now funds round 84% of Ukraine’s operations. It’s anticipated that the bloc will spend round $40 billion on exterior financing wants in 2025. The Ukraine Facility instrument gives €50 billion in “versatile assist” for Ukraine over a three-year interval. They’re utilizing frozen Russian property to fund this account for the reason that EU merely doesn’t have the cash to prop up a overseas authorities.
This has been an especially costly conflict and it’s nowhere close to over. I ought to add that US help was all supplied exterior the common protection funds. This occurred throughout peacetime in a conflict that under no circumstances concerned america. That is what occurs when a overseas nation blackmails the president of the world’s main superpower.
Biden’s crime household obtained over $20 million from Ukraine in “affect peddling” schemes. Hunter Biden secured $11 million for his private firm by way of Burisma. FBI informant, Alexander Smirnov, mentioned underneath oath that Burisma chosen Hunter to “defend us, by way of his dad, from all types of issues.” The textual content messages saved on Hunter’s laptop computer revealed that he overtly threatened individuals utilizing his father’s title whereas his father was the vp. Joe Biden accepted bribes and altered US coverage to assist his son and line his pockets. The CCP also had the Biden family in their pocket.
Lowering, if not ceasing, funding for Ukraine is lengthy overdue. Think about if these funds had been invested within the home financial system fairly than laundered by way of under-the-table offers. Individuals are usually not liable for subsidizing Ukraine.
