ADVERTISEMENT
What defines Donald Trump is his capability to rework any problem right into a high-voltage patriotic mission.
Trump has not too long ago tied Greenland, the Gulf of Mexico, and the Panama Canal right into a single burst of nationwide technique; it’s clear that he prioritizes placing the flag forward of any negotiation—a stance that appears to have been misplaced in Spain, buried underneath the fog of political correctness.
Trump made clear that the USA ought to safe its «very important pursuits» by buying Greenland, fiercely defending his rebranded Gulf of America, and guaranteeing management of the Panama Canal.
Magistral clase de geopolítica de Trump a Sánchez https://t.co/hbHR2dPlEW
— okdiario.com (@okdiario) January 8, 2025
It sounds daring, even formidable, however behind this imaginative and prescient is a robust logic: an unwavering dedication to defending nationwide pursuits.
Whereas Spain’s president indicators clean checks to Brussels or Rabat, Trump thinks of his fellow Individuals as if his personal life depends upon it.
Now, let’s examine this to Pedro Sánchez, a frontrunner whose political spine appears to be fabricated from playdough.
In Might 2021, whereas Ceuta confronted an unprecedented immigratory surge, Sánchez selected probably the most humiliating diplomatic give up in many years.
He handed over the Sahara to Morocco in a transfer he didn’t even have the decency to seek the advice of with Parliament about. The message was clear, he made Mohamed sturdy and rolled the pink carpet to our adversary.
Whereas Rabat handled us as their yard, Sánchez was strolling by way of Europe handing out selfie smiles and delivering empty speeches about «worldwide solidarity.»
What would occur if Trump can be the Spanish president? The Rock of Gibraltar wouldn’t final two tweets. With a “Make Spain Nice Once more” in a Castilian model, the flag factories can be working additional time. The American chief would have the Brits return even the monkey souvenirs. Whereas Spaniards can be debating whether or not Gibraltar is an issue, Trump would have already constructed a golf course on the rock, and the Gibraltarians would have swapped bacon for Spanish lard.
After all, the left is scandalized and crying. Trump displays “Yankee imperialism,” and “aggressive diplomacy.” Personally, I’d want a diplomacy that dares to demand and negotiate fairly than one which merely picks up scraps.
Trump talks about Greenland as a result of he is aware of that his place might solidify his nation’s geopolitical benefit. In the meantime, in Europe we’re debating the right way to set up immigrant quotas, ignoring the truth that mass migration is a political device used to destabilize democracies.
And right here, after we face a historic disaster with incoming immigrants, president Sánchez rushes to thank “Moroccan cooperation,” whereas the arrival of minors occupy headlines and neighbor nations seek for solutions.
Trump, with a realistic imaginative and prescient and a pointy eye for alternative, understands that nationwide pursuits are non-negotiable.
The Panama Canal isn’t just a waterway; it’s the proper metaphor for managing the threads of worldwide commerce.
Greenland isn’t just ice and polar bears; it’s a treasure trove of mineral sources and a key piece within the Arctic recreation. And the Gulf of Mexico? Effectively, that’s the yard any neighbor would need securely locked.
If Spain had a Trump, we’d nonetheless have a revered place on the worldwide stage.
Gibraltar can be very completely different from what it’s at this time, and the Brits wouldn’t be mocking us; Ceuta and Melilla would have a wall that even Hadrian’s wouldn’t have been capable of match; and the Sahara wouldn’t have modified palms with out not less than listening to from the Spanish authorities. However right here we’re, caught between “dialogue tables” and “historic agreements,” handing over the keys to the home and thanking them for not altering the locks.
The distinction between Trump and Sánchez is that one performs geopolitical chess, whereas the opposite entertains himself taking part in tic-tac-toe along with his spouse Begoña. And whereas Trump grabs the board and tilts it in his route, Sánchez limits himself to applauding the opponent’s strikes.
In the long run, between Greenland and Ceuta, between the Panama Canal and the Sahara, what’s at stake shouldn’t be solely the management of territories or routes; it’s the soul of countries and their capability to manage their future.
So, snigger, criticize, and despise Trump all you need, progressives, however perceive one factor: in his mannequin of management, there’s one thing we’ve forgotten right here—the desire to be extra than simply spectators in historical past.
Whereas Sánchez will get caught up in commemorating Franco’s demise, Trump, in his pragmatic and resolute approach, reminds us that those that don’t battle for what’s theirs find yourself watching others take it on the expense of their future.
About The Writer
