COMMENT: Marty, I’ve been with you since 1987. I’ve watched your Financial Confidence Mannequin blow everybody out of the water, and your critics are simply idiots who’re both genuinely simply silly or they’re paid by the “membership” to attempt to forestall individuals from listening to you. Anybody who criticizes you isn’t reliable. The world ought to take discover of what you found. I noticed your ECM predict the 1987 crash to the day. The Japanese Crash. The 1998 July twentieth excessive within the markets. The 2002 low. There are such a lot of occasions on the precise day that there could be no dispute that this isn’t your opinion, but individuals attempt to ignore you, and others hate you. Now, Might fifteenth was the precise day for the peach talks, and June 2nd was Russia’s Pearl Harbor. Everybody ought to ship letters demanding that you just get the Nobel Peace Prize for humanity’s sake.
L
REPLY: I perceive what you’re saying. Sure, I can see {that a} Nobel Prize would possibly assist focus consideration on the fact of cycles. Nonetheless, the Financial Confidence Mannequin is one thing I ran into, and I had assumed it might be a median. By no means in my wildest creativeness did I ever anticipate that such a mannequin would work exactly to the day for numerous geopolitical occasions, like 911, to the very day, and the identical actual frequency picks the occasions right here in Might to June 2025.
I simply have no idea. Do I deserve a Nobel Prize for one thing I actually can’t solely clarify that exists when all the traditional pondering says that it could actually’t be? I’m working diligently on my subsequent e book, the Financial Confidence Mannequin. Maybe then let the world decide. What number of coincidences does it take to show there’s a hidden order lurking behind the looks of random chaos?
