By a campfire on the shore of Lake Geneva in 1816, 5 mates take up the problem of telling the scariest story. Mary Shelley is clearly the winner, along with her cautionary story (quickly to be a novel) of an obsessed physician whose electrified monster achieves sentience, then runs wild. So freaked out is her pal Lord Byron that his rapid, sneering response — “you’re demented” — rapidly turns right into a shiver and a prayer.
“Could we by no means be intelligent sufficient to create one thing that may exchange us,” he says.
A mere 424 years later, in 2240, two post-human beings look again on that vignette, and the entire of the Anthropocene, with surprise and pity. How may folks have considered themselves because the endpoint of evolution, certainly one of these inorganic intelligences asks rhetorically, when mankind was clearly simply “a transitional species” and “a blip on the timeline”?
That timeline is the compelling if considerably overbearing structural system of Jordan Harrison’s play “The Antiquities,” which opened on Tuesday at Playwrights Horizons. Beginning with Shelley’s monster (which she counterfactually calls a “laptop”) and ending with, nicely, the tip of humanity, it may win a scary-story contest itself, because it maps one doable route, the Through Technologica, from Romantic glory to species demise.
For the inorganics of 2240 are right here to not reward mankind however to bury it. They’re guides to “reveals” in what the play’s different title calls “A Tour of the Everlasting Assortment within the Museum of Late Human Antiquities.” The Shelley scene is the primary of 12 such reveals, demonstrating how innovations regularly overtook pure intelligence after which, like Frankenstein’s monster, destroyed it.
At first, the innovations appear helpful or innocent or — to us, smack in the midst of the timeline — hopelessly out of date. A girl in 1910 (Cindy Cheung) presents a wood finger to a boy injured in a workhouse accident. A nerd circa 1978 (Ryan Spahn) reveals off an ungainly robotic prototype that acknowledges 400 English phrases. (The man who’s pleasuring the nerd is impressed.) In 1987, a mom (Kristen Sieh) whose grieving son (Julius Rinzel) can not sleep agrees to let him watch certainly one of her soaps, recorded on that magical but soon-to-be-discontinued know-how, the Betamax videotape.
A few of these scenes are fantastically drawn, with the wit, pith and undercurrent of disappointment attribute of Harrison’s greatest work. (The alternatives and perils of A.I. as human companions have been the topic of his play “Marjorie Prime,” a Pulitzer finalist in 2015.) The boy who will get the prosthetic finger is left on the workhouse as a result of his household can not afford him. (Father to son: “Effectively. Goodbye, Tom. I don’t anticipate I’ll see you once more.”) The explanation the 1987 boy is grieving is that his bachelor uncle was buried that day. We don’t should be advised what he died of.
However different scenes, like one set in 2076, when the final people reside as outlaws in a dystopia of semi-robot overlords, really feel extra like place fillers, vital as steps in Harrison’s timeline however not compelling in themselves. Others are barely throwaways, bleak vaudeville sketches that make a degree and black out.
Due to this discontinuity of time and character — the 9 fantastic actors play 45 roles — “The Antiquities” shouldn’t be cumulative within the standard sense, by which conduct and consequence are related inside the confines of a life, an hour and even an instantaneous. Reasonably, as quickly as we care about somebody, that somebody is snuffed out.
I imply by the playwright, however in fact each human, within the play and in any other case, is snuffed out in a extra literal sense too. That is helpful in highlighting the theme of mortality, each on the non-public and geological scales, directing you to suppose much less concerning the worth of a life than of life-forms. Maybe the play’s most dreadful line is spoken by a author (Amelia Workman) who by 2031 — simply six years therefore! — can not compete out there with A.I.
“If they will do all the things that makes me me,” she asks, “then what’s the purpose of me?”
Although this character disappears from the story a second later, Harrison has not left his play with nothing to carry it collectively. The place characters are fleeting, concepts and pictures recur, usually throughout lengthy stretches. Many scenes are linked by references to earlier ones, like structural Easter eggs. We meet Percy Shelley — Mary’s husband — in that first scene by the campfire; within the second, practically a century later, we hear a girl struggling to learn his “Ode to the West Wind.” An A.I. system one character considers implanting in 2032 is implanted in everybody by 2076.
The logic, then, is much less narrative than poetic — or to place it one other approach, it’s software program not {hardware}. If that’s a daring selection, it pays off spectacularly about two-thirds of the best way by way of the play’s 95 minutes. Because the timeline involves its obvious finish, our guides introduce us to a particular exhibit, in contrast to the others.
This can be a reliquary of human know-how, revealed in a scene that means how future beings, like paleontologists inferring big dinosaurs from tiny bones, get a lot incorrect. For all their brainpower, they misconstrue Pert shampoo as a tender drink, clarinets as medical devices, Betamaxes as some sort of treasure requiring refrigeration.
Beautiful moments like that, hilarious and scalding, bear the hallmark not solely of Harrison but in addition of David Cromer, who directed “The Antiquities” with Caitlin Sullivan. Every part is completely judged for optimum impact with out overstatement: the matte steel panels (units by Paul Steinberg), the museum-case lighting (by Tyler Micoleau), the sociologically pinpoint costumes (by Brenda Abbandandolo), the creepy sound (by Christopher Darbassie) and particularly the props (by Matt Carlin).
Although extraordinarily minimal, and at all times tastefully restrained, all of it appears like 1,000,000 bucks — which can be why the play is a three-way co-production, with Playwrights and the Winery Theater in New York and the Goodman Theater in Chicago.
However in by no means going too far it could be that “The Antiquities” doesn’t go far sufficient. Its final third, which I gained’t spoil, revises our view of the timeline cleverly however strains to justify itself. To the extent it does, it’s within the old school approach that the remainder of the play has so usually abjured: by making an attempt to interact us with people as vivid, significant people, not merely as awkward bearers of a dying intelligence.
Within the course of, Harrison’s play appears to equate the pure want to outlive, to really feel and to matter — to find, to mourn, to get pleasure from and create — with a sort of hubris that, like international warming, will lead inevitably to extinction. Was the Betamax responsible? Was Mary Shelley’s imaginative and prescient? “The Antiquities” is lastly much less a memorial than a morality pageant. That will not be incorrect nevertheless it’s solely half the story.
The Antiquities
Via Feb. 23 at Playwrights Horizons, Manhattan; playwrightshorizons.org. Working time: 1 hour 35 minutes.
