A state choose in Texas has issued a last-minute resolution to pause the execution of Robert Roberson, a person convicted in a controversial case of shaken child syndrome.
Roberson is believed to be the primary individual ever sentenced to loss of life in america for an alleged killing linked to the syndrome.
However on Thursday, with solely hours to go till the sentence was carried out, Travis County Civil District Court docket Choose Jessica Mangrum issued a short lived restraining order halting the execution.
Roberson was convicted of homicide in 2003 for the loss of life of his two-year-old daughter Nikki Curtis a 12 months earlier.
However he has strongly maintained his innocence. Specialists have additionally solid doubt on the proof used to convict him, and the last-minute order has introduced reduction to those that believed the execution would signify a miscarriage of justice.
“He’s an harmless man, and we’re very near killing him for one thing he didn’t do,” Brian Wharton, the lead detective who investigated Curtis’s loss of life. He has since change into a vocal proponent for commuting Roberson’s sentence.
On the coronary heart of the case was the prosecutors’ accusation that the toddler Curtis died from shaken child syndrome, a phrase used to explain head trauma stemming from the abuse of kids youthful than 5.
Critics, nevertheless, have dismissed shaken child syndrome as an unproven analysis, primarily based on outdated science and research of uncertain accuracy.
In January 2002, Roberson introduced his daughter to an emergency room, the place scans confirmed inside mind trauma. Curtis had been sick with a fever within the days prior, and Roberson mentioned she had fallen out of her mattress.
Some medical consultants have instructed she probably died as a result of problems from pneumonia quite than abuse by Roberson, as prosecutors alleged.
His case has introduced nationwide consideration to Texas, the place a bunch together with conservative lawmakers, legal justice reform advocates and medical officers have solid doubt on Roberson’s guilt.
Roberson’s legal professionals additionally argued that authorities misconstrued signs of their shopper’s autism as an absence of emotion after Curtis’s loss of life.
Prosecutors had highlighted Roberson’s seemingly stoic nature as proof of his guilt. However since his conviction, Roberson has been identified with autism, which might have an effect on the way in which folks categorical themselves.
“Texas plans to execute Robert Roberson subsequent Thursday — regardless of a conviction primarily based on junk science. Even former detectives on his case consider Roberson is harmless,” the state department of the American Civil Liberties Union mentioned in a social media put up final week.
Inform Gov. Abbott to cease this night’s execution of Robert Roberson.
Roberson was convicted on junk science. The lead detective now says he ought to be free. Prime GOP lawmakers need the execution halted.
The governor can halt this. Let Abbott know: https://t.co/TSP8F7YxRy
— ACLU of Texas (@ACLUTx) October 17, 2024
Thursday’s execution, nevertheless, was halted after a committee within the Republican-controlled state Home of Representatives petitioned for a restraining order, in an effort to purchase extra time.
Numerous lawmakers within the Texas Home chamber — each Republicans and Democrats — had lobbied for the case to get one other look.
The Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles had nonetheless rejected Roberson’s bid for clemency on Wednesday, and the US Supreme Court docket denied a request for a keep on the execution earlier on Thursday.
Robertson was scheduled to die on Thursday by lethal injection at a state penitentiary in Huntsville, Texas.
Using lethal injection as a type of execution continues to be controversial within the US and has resulted in quite a few “botched” efforts that critics say induced useless struggling for the condemned.
A 2023 Gallup ballot discovered that individuals within the US proceed to assist the death penalty for these convicted of homicide by a margin of 53 to 44 p.c. Nonetheless, 50 p.c of respondents mentioned that the loss of life penalty was utilized unfairly, whereas 47 p.c mentioned it was utilized pretty.
