In a ruling that’s shaken the corrupt foundations of the European Union, the EU’s high court docket has declared that Fee President Ursula von der Leyen broke transparency rules by hiding secret textual content messages she exchanged with Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla—simply because the EU was locking itself into the largest vaccine deal in its historical past.
The judgment, handed down by the European Court docket of Justice (ECJ), exposes a damning breach of public belief and fuels the rising outcry over what critics have dubbed “Pfizergate”—a scandal that underscores every part incorrect with the unaccountable EU forms, Massive Pharma’s grip on coverage, and von der Leyen’s corrupt, authoritarian type of rule.
#EUGeneralCourt annuls the @EU_Commission choice refusing The New York Occasions entry to textual content messages exchanged between President @vonderleyen and the CEO of @Pfizer within the context of #COVID vaccine procurement https://t.co/ATb3CgbPxg
— EU Court docket of Justice (@EUCourtPress) May 14, 2025
Whereas globalists nonetheless cling to the drained narrative of “saving lives,” the truth now laid naked is that the EU chief struck backroom offers price billions of euros with out oversight or file—offers that compelled member states into shopping for as much as 1.8 billion doses of the experimental Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 shot, a product mired in considerations about unwanted effects, rushed testing, and information suppression.
The Fee tried to comb the messages beneath the rug, initially claiming they didn’t exist—till a 2021 New York Occasions interview revealed they did. In that piece, Bourla gushed about how his cozy chats with von der Leyen constructed “deep belief,” proper earlier than the vaccine contract—the most important the EU ever signed—was sealed.
The court docket wasn’t shopping for the cover-up. In its scathing choice, the ECJ dominated the Fee “failed to elucidate in a believable method” why it didn’t hold the texts or deal with them as official paperwork. In different phrases, the EU’s personal watchdog admitted what skeptics knew all alongside: the deal was hatched within the shadows, with no paper path, no accountability, and no regard for the general public’s proper to know.
Even the normally tame European Ombudsman referred to as it “maladministration.” That’s bureaucrat-speak for corruption.
Von der Leyen, as soon as the golden lady of Brussels, now finds herself on the coronary heart of the EU’s largest transparency scandal in a long time. Critics on the proper—and even a couple of from the liberal left—are hammering her for dodging duty whereas preaching democracy, transparency, accountability, and the ‘rule of regulation.’
Dutch MEP Raquel García Hermida-van der Walle referred to as the ruling a “slam dunk for transparency”, stating the plain: “Individuals are allowed to know the way choices are made—even when it’s carried out over a textual content message.”
Unbiased Irish MEP Michael McNamara didn’t mince phrases both, saying von der Leyen’s actions confirmed she wasn’t remotely dedicated to openness.
‘Pfizergate’ verdict: EU Fee incorrect to dam entry to von der Leyen’s secret texts.https://t.co/UtPbuG8nwu pic.twitter.com/4SRbHMSwlS
— Michael McNamara MEP (@McNamaraMEP) May 14, 2025
And let’s not neglect—this is similar lady who went to nice lengths to safe one other five-year time period working the EU like her private fiefdom. In the meantime, her administration hides paperwork, muzzles dissent, handles political adversaries with marked partiality and a disregard for ideas of equity, and pushes experimental jabs on an unsuspecting public.
Von der Leyen’s excuse? The messages didn’t include “essential” data. That’s wealthy. These weren’t birthday needs—they have been direct negotiations with the CEO of the pharmaceutical firm that stood to make billions from a vaccine that was, and stays, extremely controversial. In truth, the deal let the EU resell or donate unused vaccines, making the bloc a intermediary for Massive Pharma. Not “essential.” Uh, proper…
Even now, Pfizer’s contract phrases stay closely redacted. Member states signed away their rights, shouldered the legal responsibility, and paid by the nostril for photographs that many now query—not only for efficacy however for security. And when the general public needed solutions? Silence. Deleted messages. A authorized dodge.
This verdict isn’t solely about von der Leyen’s secret texts. It’s a few damaged system, one the place unelected bureaucrats in Brussels collude with company giants behind closed doorways, imposing radical agendas on tens of millions with out consent or consequence.
It’s a few globalist elite that pushed lockdowns, digital vaccine passports, and experimental mRNA expertise with non secular fervor—whereas silencing dissent and demonizing anybody who dared to ask questions.
And now, as courtrooms catch as much as what common sense residents have identified for years, the EU’s ethical authority lies in ruins.
The Fee, true to type, responded with bland PR spin. “Transparency has at all times been of paramount significance,” it claimed in a press release. That will be humorous if it weren’t so infuriating.
Von der Leyen says she’ll “resolve on subsequent steps,” however the writing’s on the wall. The individuals of Europe deserve leaders who reply to voters—to not unelected technocrats and Massive Pharma bosses.
This ruling is a watershed second for the European mission—one that ought to drive a reckoning with the vanity, secrecy, and corruption at its core. For too lengthy, Eurocrats like von der Leyen have operated above the regulation, proof against scrutiny. Now the masks is slipping.
