Justin Baldoni’s Lawyer Fires Back At Ryan Reynolds Over Dismissal Request

On Tuesday, Reynolds filed a movement to dismiss Baldoni’s lawsuit towards him, arguing that the director was being “thin-skinned” for claiming that the “Nicepool” character in “Deadpool & Wolverine” was meant to mock him.

Nevertheless, Justin Baldoni’s legal professional, Bryan Freedman, is pushing again arduous, calling Ryan Reynolds’ transfer an abuse of energy and half of a bigger scheme to break Baldoni’s profession.

In a press release to TMZ, Freedman made it clear that Baldoni’s workforce is not going to again down, accusing Reynolds of actively working to smear Baldoni in Hollywood.

“Mr. Reynolds’ exploitation of his huge energy in Hollywood continues, this time arrogantly asking to be dismissed from the case regardless of his publicly documented involvement extending far past simply being a ‘supportive partner,'” Freedman stated.

In accordance with Freedman, Reynolds was allegedly a driving pressure behind efforts to destroy Baldoni’s profession, claiming the “Deadpool” star was concerned in defaming Baldoni, pressuring WME into dropping him as a consumer, and making an attempt to blacklist him inside the business.

Reynolds’ authorized workforce has requested that the case be dismissed with prejudice, which might stop Baldoni from refiling it sooner or later. Nevertheless, Baldoni’s legal professional argues that Reynolds’ involvement is just too important to be ignored.

Freedman went on to say that Reynolds’ makes an attempt to downplay the case as merely “harm emotions” had been nothing greater than an try and make bullying appear acceptable.

“His fingerprints have been throughout this smear marketing campaign towards Justin and the Wayfarer workforce since day one,” Freedman continued. “Mr. Reynolds now makes an attempt to cut back plainly cognizable claims to ‘harm emotions,’ sending a transparent message that bullying is appropriate.”

Freedman did not maintain again, calling out Reynolds for making an attempt to flee accountability whereas persevering with to joke concerning the controversy in public appearances.

“After lighting a match, Mr. Reynolds now seeks to run from the flames. It gained’t work,” Freedman acknowledged. “The Wayfarer Events’ claims towards him are actual, and they’re critical. Mr. Reynolds can seem on as many sketch reveals as he needs and feebly attempt to make mild of his present scenario, however we is not going to cease till he’s held accountable for his actions.”

Again in January 2025, Baldoni accused Reynolds of defamation, alleging that the actor referred to as him a “sexual predator” in an effort to have his company, WME, sever ties with him. Nevertheless, Reynolds’ attorneys argued that such a press release was not defamatory and that the actor had the appropriate to specific his opinion.

In a press release to Page Six, Reynolds’ authorized workforce defended the actor’s proper to voice his beliefs, asserting that his statements weren’t defamatory except Baldoni might show Reynolds didn’t imagine them to be true. “However right here is the issue, that isn’t defamation except they will present that Mr. Reynolds didn’t imagine that assertion to be true,” Reynolds’ attorneys acknowledged.

They continued, “The grievance would not allege that, and simply the other, the allegations within the grievance counsel that Mr. Reynolds genuinely believes Mr. Baldoni is a predator.”

The authorized workforce additionally referenced Blake Energetic’s accusations towards Baldoni, citing a number of complaints by which she alleged sexual harassment and retaliation. They additional identified that Baldoni has beforehand spoken about his previous conduct involving ladies and boundary-pushing consent, suggesting that Reynolds’ perception in calling him a predator was not unfounded.

Moreover, Reynolds’ workforce emphasised that freedom of speech underneath the U.S. Structure protects his proper to specific such an opinion.

“Mr. Reynolds has a proper to specific his opinion of Mr. Baldoni,” his attorneys argued.

In addition they turned the tables on Baldoni, noting that the director himself had publicly labeled Reynolds and Energetic as “bullies” all through the lawsuit. Reynolds’ attorneys sarcastically prompt that Baldoni ought to discover their argument for dismissal “comforting” since he had engaged in comparable name-calling.

With each side doubling down on their claims, the authorized feud between Reynolds, Energetic, and Baldoni reveals no indicators of slowing down.

Whereas Reynolds’ workforce argues that he was properly inside his rights to name Baldoni a “predator,” Baldoni continues to say that Reynolds intentionally tried to wreck his profession by way of each private {and professional} assaults.