Good morning. The massive market information over the weekend, if you wish to name it that, was a Trump social media put up reaffirming the president’s dedication to a strategic cryptocurrency reserve, which despatched crypto costs flying. The concept is so silly and mistaken that Unhedged won’t dignify it with remark. Electronic mail me about one thing else: robert.armstrong@ft.com.
The ‘it’s all Trump’s fault’ narrative
Unhedged wrote final week concerning the “vibe shift”: a set of sentiment readings, market management modifications, and weak financial information that collectively recommend that one thing elementary has modified in markets and the financial system, and never for the higher.
The consensus view is that the vibe shift has been brought on by the Trump administration. That the market narrative would coalesce round this concept makes psychological sense. Trump’s move-fast-and-break-things coverage agenda has dominated the information whereas the vibe shift has unfolded; it’s pure to attract a causal hyperlink between the 2. We ought to be cautious, although. The simplest market narrative isn’t all the time the best one, and focusing an excessive amount of on the coverage backdrop, nevertheless revolutionary, can obscure different components of the image.
The cost sheet in opposition to the administration has three fundamental components:
Coverage uncertainty and coverage sequencing are crushing sentiment. Current sentiment survey outcomes from the College of Michigan and the Convention Board confirmed notable declines, and respondents to each surveys singled out tariff coverage and inflation as causes of concern. Analysts have additionally pointed to the Baker, Bloom, Davis index of financial coverage uncertainty as proof that the administration’s abrupt and aggressive strategy to coverage is wrecking the temper. The BDM index tracks media protection, impending modifications in tax coverage, and the dispersion of financial forecasts. It has solely ever been increased at the beginning of the Covid pandemic:
A part of the issue is that, in a reversal of the primary Trump administration, market-unfriendly tariff and immigration polices have been the early precedence, whereas market-friendly tax cuts and deregulation have been deferred. Right here is Pimco economist Tiffany Wilding:
We predict the preliminary reactions within the markets [to Trump’s election] — just like these seen within the sentiment surveys — possible mirror higher give attention to anticipated pro-growth insurance policies, such because the potential for extra near-term tax cuts and deregulation. Nonetheless, the bulletins since Trump’s inauguration have been extra centered on probably disruptive commerce and immigration coverage actions and steeper cuts in authorities providers . . . Markets is perhaps catching on to the shifting steadiness of dangers
One bond supervisor summed it up extra concisely: “The backdrop is turning into more and more easy: many of the coverage actions and proposals out of Washington are progress unfavorable.”
Sentiment is weighing on exercise. The most recent (but hardly the only) proof of an financial slowdown got here on Friday, when the federal government’s private consumption expenditure report confirmed inflation-adjusted client spending falling by 0.5 per cent in January, led down by sturdy items and particularly vehicles. Companies spending softened, too, whereas the financial savings fee rose. It’s the worst studying in since 2021:
Right here is Barclays economist Christian Keller:
Excessive uncertainty about tariffs, DOGE, funds deficits and a Ukraine peace deal has began to weigh on US exercise . . . Certainly, the latest information recommend coverage is already having unfavorable spillovers . . . spending and commerce information and expectations for an extra drag from uncertainty lead us to revise down our GDP forecasts for Q1 (-1.0pp) and Q2 (-0.5pp) to 1.5 per cent q/q . . . we nonetheless suppose that this quantities to extra of a slowdown than a recession, however it’s a vital deceleration from the expansion charges of the previous two years.
The view that we’re seeing an coverage uncertainty-driven slowdown matches with what we have now seen within the bond market. Since Treasury yields peaked in January, their decline is sort of all right down to falling actual charges — that are linked to progress — slightly than to declines in inflation expectations:
Lastly, uncertainty could weigh on funding, which might lower longer-term progress. Torsten Slok of Apollo has gathered a spread of Fed surveys of firms’ capital expenditure plans. All have been rising for a couple of years, however all ticked down in February:
Slok argues that “DOGE and tariffs mixed are a gentle short-term shock to the financial system that can put modest upward strain on inflation and modest downward strain on GDP.”
The “it’s Trump’s fault” speculation is logical in broad define however would possibly simply be taken too far. Trump’s most necessary trait is his capability to make individuals emotional, and in markets coolness is all. So listed below are 4 factors to bear in mind:
The financial system has been operating above its pattern progress fee, and a slowdown isn’t any shock. The US just isn’t, in the long term, a 2.5-3 per cent actual progress financial system, however that’s what we have now had for the previous few years. Maybe Trump insurance policies made the step right down to a extra sensible 1-2 per cent progress come sooner, however this was coming, particularly with the Fed’s coverage fee parked at 4.5 per cent.
One month is only one month (particularly in January). Financial information is lumpy. Chilly climate and fires in all probability has one thing to do with the most recent spending figures. And bizarre stuff occurs in January for no matter motive (take a look at January 2024 and 2023 within the PCE chart above).
Even when the market is responding to the coverage onslaught, what is going on appears just like the reversal of the overhyped Trump trades of late final 12 months, slightly than one thing deeper. The spherical journey taken by small cap shares — darlings of the “Trump will enhance home progress” notion — exemplifies this:
Lastly, it’s value remembering that the largest sea-change available in the market — the latest underperformance of the Magnificent 7 large tech shares — doesn’t seem like a response to Trump coverage noise. If something, one would suppose an unsure coverage backdrop would make these shares extra interesting, on condition that their progress just isn’t pushed by the financial cycle. As a substitute, their relative decline appears like a pure correction after an wild bull run, and the Magazine 7 will not be the one a part of the market that has come to look overextended. There’s a greater query in markets than Trump: can US threat belongings return to one thing resembling normalcy after a number of years of astonishing post-pandemic exuberance?
Trump is an attention-attracting machine. However attributing an excessive amount of of what’s going on in markets and the financial system to the administration could be a mistake.
One good learn
A fundamental blue suit.
FT Unhedged podcast
Can’t get sufficient of Unhedged? Hearken to our new podcast, for a 15-minute dive into the most recent markets information and monetary headlines, twice every week. Make amends for previous editions of the e-newsletter here.
