This interview carried out by Alexander Junger and was initially printed by Eagle Eye Explore on Might 12, 2025. It was edited for readability and is printed right here at The Gateway Pundit with very sort permission.
Christine Anderson is a Member of the European Parliament representing the right-wing, anti-globalist Different for Germany (AfD) celebration, recognized for her outspoken criticism of EU paperwork, globalism, and what she views as creeping authoritarianism in Western democracies. Since getting into the European Parliament in 2019, she has change into a outstanding voice inside the AfD, incessantly difficult mainstream narratives on immigration, civil liberties, and pandemic coverage.
On this wide-ranging interview, Different for Germany (AfD) Member of the European Parliament Christine Anderson presents a searing indictment of Germany’s political course, warning of an ominous drift towards authoritarianism. True to kind, the outspoken AfD firebrand takes intention at outgoing Inside Minister Nancy Faeser, accusing her of systematically eroding civil liberties whereas deceptive the general public in regards to the scale of unlawful migration. Anderson tackles a broad array of urgent points—together with unchecked authorities overreach, censorship, pandemic-era authoritarianism, and mounting threats to press freedom and free expression. She additional condemns the CDU’s collaboration with the novel left-wing globalist Social Democrats, defends the AfD’s rising standard help amid efforts by an more and more discredited institution to marginalize it, and cautions in opposition to a broader EU-wide shift towards centralized, unaccountable governance.
Nancy Faeser, Germany’s outgoing federal inside minister—broadly seen as a far-left activist who, throughout her tenure, arguably did greater than any predecessor to undermine the nation’s safety and freedom—not too long ago claimed the ‘visitors mild’ coalition has considerably curbed unlawful migration, pointing to slight will increase in deportations and fewer asylum claims. Many view her assertion as out of contact and dismissive of public concern. How do you interpret her remarks?
You’re completely proper. It’s truthfully unbelievable—the vary of insurance policies Faeser has pushed by is staggering. And now, there’s the most recent scandal that broke simply yesterday: a journalist from Deutschland Kurier was convicted of defaming her. What occurred? He posted a meme displaying her holding an indication that learn, ‘I hate freedom of speech.’ She pressed expenses, and the court docket sentenced him to seven months in jail, though it was suspended on probation. Nonetheless, that’s outrageous—it truly is.
Anyway, that’s only one extra instance—amongst many—we’ve seen over the previous a number of months, and even years. Take final 12 months, for example: there was an enormous incident involving Robert Habeck, the Minister of Economics. Somebody had posted a meme that includes a silhouette of his head subsequent to a hair product model, with the caption ‘Schwab, COVID,’ which mainly means ‘moron.’ Nicely, the police confirmed up on the poster’s home at six within the morning, searched the place, and confiscated his telephone, pc—the whole lot. It’s actually insane. So sure, I feel it’s honest to say that in Germany right this moment, we’re now not residing in an actual democracy.
Past that, Faeser has focused the police, launched purges in opposition to alleged ‘right-wing extremists’ within the civil service, and pressured the press. How do you clarify her potential to pursue such a sweeping agenda with out vital political pushback?
Nicely, you’re proper—and what the federal government’s doing is including insult to harm. Proper now in Germany, we’re seeing a mean of two brutal gang rapes each single day. These aren’t minor assaults—we’re speaking about girls being viciously crushed, struggling damaged skulls, shattered jawbones—assaults that go away them barely clinging to life. And that doesn’t even embrace the rapes dedicated by particular person perpetrators.
On high of that, we’re now dealing with random knife assaults on an hourly foundation. It’s not simply every day anymore—there are 13, 14, generally 15 such stabbings occurring all throughout Germany daily. But, should you dare to talk out about this, you’re instantly labeled an Islamophobe or a right-wing extremist. The second you criticize what’s occurring, these labels get thrown at you.
Even worse, criticism of the federal government is now being handled as “delegitimization of the state.” Which means merely expressing dissent can land you on the radar of the home intelligence company, as if you’re making an attempt to overthrow the federal government. However in any true democracy, holding your leaders accountable—criticizing their actions—isn’t just a proper, it’s a accountability. Silencing that criticism crosses a line into authoritarianism, and that’s precisely the place we’re heading.
I perceive there are definitely dangerous actors within the previous events—the SPD, the Greens, and the CDU—however absolutely there are additionally some well-meaning people amongst them. They have to see the place the present trajectory of the German state leads. So why don’t they communicate out? It could be in their very own curiosity—and much more so, of their youngsters’s. Is it a failure of braveness, or just a scarcity of self-reflection?
To me, that is the true conundrum. In Germany, we’ve skilled totalitarianism firsthand—underneath the Nazis within the Thirties and in East Germany underneath the GDR. So, if anybody ought to have the ability to acknowledge the indicators of totalitarianism, it needs to be the German individuals. However sadly, they’re not seeing it. Now, they appear to suppose it’s acceptable as a result of it’s being executed by the “good guys.” However that’s the crux of the problem: it’s by no means okay.
The hazard lies not within the insurance policies themselves or the intentions behind them, however within the strategies used to realize these targets. For instance, ending world starvation is a noble purpose—who wouldn’t need that? However the true query is: how do you propose to realize it? The issue arises when the trail to that purpose includes oppression or infringing on basic rights. That’s the place we have to draw the road. Even one of the best intentions can go astray in the event that they’re carried out by authoritarian means. As Camus famously mentioned, “The welfare of the individuals is the alibi of tyrants.”
How do you view the present political state of affairs, significantly in mild of the guarantees made by celebration leaders and the continued makes an attempt to destroy your celebration by portray it as some type of neo-Nazi celebration within the eyes of the German public?
The factor is, they tried their hardest to perform that purpose, however they’re failing. Within the final election, we hit 20% for the primary time, and now we’re polling at 20-24%. We’re even with the Christian Democrats, who was once the primary conservative celebration in Germany. I personally voted for them from the time I turned 18 till 2005.
On this election, the celebration chief mentioned all the appropriate issues, and folks trusted him, considering he would deliver change. In consequence, he obtained round 27-28% of the vote. However the very day after the election, he broke his primary promise, which was to shut the borders—one thing he had campaigned on.
He ran on the promise of the debt brake—no extra debt. He acquired elected and got here in first. However the day after the election, he mentioned, “Nobody ever promised to shut the borders.” Folks have been left confused, considering, “Wait, what?” The fixed labeling of my celebration because the “evil enemy”—as if we need to abolish democracy—is totally ludicrous. The persons are beginning to understand that.
Right here’s the factor: once we have been based in March 2013, which was about 12 years in the past, the whole lot we warned about has turned out to be true. We weren’t fear-mongering or imagining issues. We laid out clear eventualities: if this occurs, that is the outcome. If that occurs, that is what is going to comply with. And it occurred. Now, persons are starting to see it.
What they’ve been making an attempt to do is now not working. And on high of that, the fixed labeling of my celebration as Nazis—repeating it in almost each sentence—will not be solely deceptive but in addition an abominable trivialization of the horrific atrocities the Nazis inflicted on humanity. That’s what they’re doing.
The CDU, following the federal snap election the place it was victorious, has seen its help drop precipitously. Pollsters have identified that no successful celebration in Germany has ever skilled such a lack of belief between the election and the formation of the federal government. Some key figures inside the CDU have brazenly voiced their opposition to Friedrich Merz’s plan to kind a coalition with the left-liberal SPD, which is unprecedented. What do you make of all this?
The so-called “wannabe Chancellor”—I’ll seek advice from him that approach—truly misplaced the general public’s belief even earlier than the federal government was fashioned. This course of began proper after the election, when he claimed, “Nobody ever mentioned something about closing borders,” even though closing borders was the highest subject he campaigned on. In consequence, he’s dropping help from many citizens in Germany who, as soon as once more, thought, “This time we will belief this man and his celebration.” They’re now utterly upset.
Moreover, many members of the Christian Democrats are livid. They bear in mind the winter election marketing campaign, when it was freezing chilly in Germany. Campaigners have been out on the streets, handing out leaflets and manning info cubicles in temperatures properly beneath freezing. They did this as a result of they believed in Friedrich Merz and hoped he would lastly deliver significant coverage adjustments to Germany. Now they really feel betrayed, realizing that wasn’t the case.
It’s comprehensible that they’re upset—and truthfully, they’ve each proper to be. It’s virtually exceptional for a potential Chancellor to lose all credibility earlier than the coalition authorities is even fashioned.
One of many regional leaders of the CDU instructed Merz that celebration members now not really feel adequately represented and are contemplating leaving the celebration. Do you suppose this can be a credible menace?
Sure, and they’re. Celebration members are leaving in droves, and extra are prone to comply with. However the primary subject right here is straightforward: Merz is a idiot. He made it clear through the marketing campaign that he wouldn’t even take into account speaking to the AfD, regardless of polls displaying that the 2 most important events can be the Christian Democrats and the AfD. By ruling out any negotiation with the AfD, he basically instructed all the opposite events, “You’ll be able to blackmail me and I’ll have to present in.” That appears to be the one promise he intends to maintain. What was he considering? Truthfully, I do not know. It doesn’t look like there was a lot thought behind it in any respect.
How do you see this unfolding? By stating publicly that the CDU received’t, underneath any circumstances, kind a center-right coalition with the AfD, Merz and the CDU management have successfully boxed themselves in and given the Social Democrats an unimaginable quantity of leverage.
Sure, they’ve boxed themselves in. Merz has executed the identical, and it doesn’t even look like he realizes what he’s executed. Alice Weidel, one of many leaders of my celebration, has been telling Merz all through the marketing campaign that “you must clarify to the individuals how you propose to implement your entire coverage adjustments with the Social Democrats and the Greens. There’s merely no method to make that work. So, how do you propose on doing it?” After all, he had no reply.
The individuals really feel totally betrayed. The underside line is that no matter Merz promised, he received’t have the ability to ship. Not solely will he fail to maintain his guarantees, however he’s additionally sure to implement regardless of the Social Democrats demand. It’s basically a state of affairs the place they will ask something of him, and he’ll must comply, or he received’t stay Chancellor.
You talked about throughout out transient dialogue earlier than the interview that you just’re listening to that the German authorities could also be contemplating abolishing the Freedom of Data Act. Are you able to inform us extra about that?
Sure, they’re truly discussing abolishing the Freedom of Data Act in Germany. Are you able to consider that? And sure, it’s much like the Freedom of Data Act within the U.S.—it’s a basic democratic software that permits residents to request info from the federal government to make sure transparency and accountability.
What prompted this? Nicely, simply earlier than the election, the Christian Democrats turned a goal of Antifa as a result of they’d launched a bit of laws to limit immigration—one thing they described as addressing what they see as an invasion. This occurred proper in the midst of the marketing campaign. In consequence, they confronted widespread protests, vandalism, and intense backlash, particularly geared toward Friedrich Merz and the CDU.
Within the midst of this, the Christian Democrats had the audacity to ask the federal government questions like: Who’re these NGOs? How are they funded? Merely asking these questions was handled like they’d opened the gates of hell. The backlash was fierce.
Now, throughout coalition negotiations, there are severe discussions about abolishing the Freedom of Data Act altogether. However that act is important—it’s a basic proper. With out it, how can residents maintain their authorities accountable? If we’re now not allowed to ask, “Why was this executed? Who made this choice? What was the justification?” then transparency disappears.
A chief instance of why this issues occurred simply final 12 months. The Ministry of Well being claimed that the Robert Koch Institute—our equal of the CDC—was performing independently and that pandemic-related measures have been primarily based purely on science. However when residents gained entry to the assembly minutes by the Freedom of Data Act, it was revealed that the alternative was true. The federal government had already selected the restrictions after which pressured the Institute to again them with scientific justification.
If we lose entry to that type of info, how will the general public ever uncover when the federal government acts in dangerous religion or serves pursuits aside from the general public good?
You have got mentioned that the COVID-19 so-called ‘vaccination marketing campaign’ will go down within the medical books as the most important medical scandal ever and the most important crime in opposition to mankind. How come?
Sure—simply take a look at the lengths they went to. This wasn’t restricted to 1 nation, or perhaps a handful; governments world wide, significantly in Western democracies, acted in full lockstep. And the rationale I emphasize Western democracies is necessary: I didn’t count on nations like China or North Korea to uphold basic rights or democratic ideas—they’re already totalitarian regimes. However I did count on democratic nations to remain true to these ideas. As an alternative, they aligned completely, utilizing the identical messaging, the identical methods, and the identical restrictions.
That’s precisely the place the assault needed to occur—on the democratic course of itself. Elections, checks and balances, citizen rights—all of it turns into a barrier once you’re making an attempt to centralize energy or construct a one-world governance construction. And so, these very ideas needed to be undermined. And the extent to which they have been prepared to go to try this was staggering.
They used the identical slogans all over the place: “Keep at dwelling,” “Nobody is protected till everyone seems to be protected,” “The an infection stops with you,” “No jab, no job,” “Construct again higher.” It was as if each authorities and establishment was studying from the identical script.
And all of this was executed to advertise mRNA injections—one thing I don’t even name a vaccine, as a result of it doesn’t meet the normal definition. These injections have been neither protected nor efficient, and what’s worse is that they knew that.
They knew the reality earlier than they pushed it on the general public. The mRNA injections have been examined on monkeys, and even then, it was clear they didn’t forestall transmission. But, they promoted it to the general public as if it did—plain and easy.
Janine Small, a Vice President at Pfizer, testified earlier than the EU Parliament’s COVID committee and was immediately requested whether or not the mRNA injection had been examined for its potential to stop an infection and transmission. Her reply? No, we by no means even examined that. So it was a blatant lie from the beginning. And on the idea of that lie, individuals have been ostracized, stigmatized, and coerced. They have been threatened with dropping their jobs. The message was clear: In the event you don’t get the jab, you’re endangering others—you’re actually killing individuals.
That’s what we have been instructed. Only for refusing the injection, we have been labeled murderers. That turned the justification for lockdowns and restrictions. Bear in mind the phrase “the pandemic of the unvaccinated”? There was no such factor. That narrative existed solely to place immense stress on individuals who selected to not take the mRNA injection. The intention was to isolate and pressure them into compliance.
And that’s precisely why I stand by my assertion: this can go down as the best crime ever dedicated in opposition to humanity—on a worldwide scale.
What occurred throughout that point marked an enormous paradigm shift. Essentially the most harmful half is that the consequences are nonetheless with us. Basic rights have been reframed as privileges—one thing the federal government can grant or withhold relying on how we behave. That’s nonetheless the case. This isn’t over.
And truthfully, who is aware of what they’ll strive subsequent? That uncertainty is terrifying. For instance, in Germany, they modified the regulation associated to infectious ailments—and people adjustments are nonetheless in impact. They nonetheless have the authorized authority to lock us down once more.
And sure, they did study from COVID. At one level, we weren’t allowed to maneuver past a 15-kilometer radius from our properties. Belief me, they needed that radius to be even smaller—however the infrastructure didn’t exist but to implement it. So now, they’re constructing that infrastructure.
And that’s what these so-called “15-minute cities” are actually about. They’re not designed in your comfort or to enhance your high quality of life. They’re about management. They’re about having the ability to lock you down extra effectively subsequent time. It’s not about saving the planet. It’s not about public well being. The true goal is complete management.
If I could add one thing right here, that is exactly why there’s a rising push to grant governing authority to the World Well being Group. The underlying purpose is to present democratically elected politicians and governments believable deniability.
They realized one thing throughout COVID: as a lot as they needed to impose even harsher restrictions, they have been restricted—as a result of in a democracy, if a politician goes too far, they threat not being re-elected. So the workaround? Shift the authority to an unelected physique just like the WHO. That approach, when harsh measures are imposed—lockdowns, vaccine mandates, or no matter else—they will say, “Hey, it wasn’t us. Our palms are tied. The WHO made the decision.”
That’s the one purpose for this push to present the WHO such sweeping powers. It’s not about well being—it’s about management by delegation. And sure, it’s devious. It’s additionally undeniably intelligent. These individuals know precisely what they’re doing.
In current months, the European Union has taken a pointy authoritarian flip, elevating severe considerations in regards to the state of democracy throughout the bloc. Final fall, after Calin Georgescu unexpectedly received Romania’s presidential election, the constitutional court docket annulled the outcome, and the election committee subsequently barred him from taking part within the re-run. Extra not too long ago, Marine Le Pen was banned from operating in France’s 2027 presidential election following a conviction for alleged misuse of EU funds. Do you see these developments as a part of a broader pattern towards political repression within the EU?
Romania is a very clear-cut instance. Calin Georgescu unexpectedly got here in first within the preliminary spherical of the presidential election, and his platform stood firmly in opposition to the EU, in opposition to the WHO, and in opposition to just about the whole lot the globalist elite are attempting to implement. And what occurred? They merely annulled the election. They accused him of being influenced by Russia or having obtained Russian funds—however supplied no proof. None. They simply shut it down.
This marks a harmful new part. Till now, the factor these establishments feared most was the democratic course of itself—free and honest elections. In a real democracy, the federal government fears the individuals. However when the individuals begin fearing the federal government, that’s now not democracy; that’s totalitarianism. And now it appears we’ve reached some extent the place, if the result of an election doesn’t go well with the institution, they’ll simply annul it. That’s the following frontier of management.
We’re seeing the identical sample emerge in France now as properly. After all, corruption and the misuse of public funds ought to carry penalties—that goes with out saying. However declaring Marine Le Pen ineligible to run in subsequent 12 months’s presidential election feels extreme, at the very least to me.
From what I’ve learn, whereas it’s not totally uncommon in France to subject such rulings in circumstances like this, what is unprecedented is making the decision provisional—successfully barring her from operating earlier than your entire authorized course of has concluded. That’s by no means occurred earlier than. Regardless that she nonetheless has authorized recourse, the choice to disqualify her within the meantime appears overtly political. It’s laborious to not see this as a politically motivated transfer.
What do you make of those “preparedness” or “survival” paperwork that governments of EU member states, together with the EU Fee itself I consider, have been passing out to their individuals? The paperwork present individuals what kind of issues they might want to survive within the occasion of typical battle, nuclear battle, authorities collapse, and an prolonged energy blackout, amongst different issues. Is that this a tactic getting used to unfold concern?
It’s all fearmongering. Only a few years in the past, individuals who ready for emergencies—preppers—have been ridiculed. You understand, those who stored additional meals and water at dwelling in case of a snowstorm, an influence outage, or another disruption. They have been labeled conspiracy theorists, even mocked as paranoid.
However now, EU establishments themselves are advising residents to fill up on provides—meals, water, fundamental necessities. Instantly, what was as soon as thought of fringe conduct is now being offered as accountable and regular.
To me, this shift suggests one thing deeper: they’re not simply encouraging preparedness for pure disasters. It appears to be like like they’re psychologically making ready the general public throughout EU member states for battle. And that’s extremely alarming.
You appear to have a very shut relationship with North America, maybe extra so than every other senior determine within the AfD. I perceive you spent six years residing in america, learning and dealing. Whenever you journey to the US or Canada as an AfD politician, what sorts of questions do individuals there ask you? What are their hopes, considerations, or views on the subject of Germany and Europe?
Nicely, they’re definitely taking note of what’s occurring in Germany—they usually’re deeply involved. Nevertheless it’s necessary to notice that what we’re experiencing right here isn’t distinctive to Germany; related patterns are unfolding throughout almost each Western democracy.
After I final visited america, a couple of 12 months and a half in the past, I used to be invited to present a collection of talks. Truthfully, I used to be shocked—genuinely moved, even. To me, the U.S. has all the time stood because the land of the free, the land of the courageous, a spot of boundless alternative. So to be invited there to talk about freedom, democracy, and the rule of regulation—it was humbling. The truth that People would need to hear a German politician communicate on these matters felt surreal.
On the finish of every of my speeches, I provided a easy request—not for cash, not for political favors, however simply this: please, return Donald Trump to the White Home. As a result of in my opinion, if we’re going to have any hope of reversing this coordinated assault on freedom, democracy, and the rule of regulation, we’d like a robust United States that leads by instance. And for that, I consider Donald Trump’s management is important.
