Visitor submit by Joel Gilbert
“We’re going to positively sue him. We’re going to be an actual ache within the ass. He’s going to know my identify personally,” Letitia James mentioned throughout her 2018 marketing campaign for New York lawyer basic.
James campaigned brazenly on her intention to focus on President Donald Trump, describing him as an “illegitimate president” and an “embarrassment,” whereas pledging to pursue all authorized avenues to scrutinize his funds and actual property transactions. After being elected, she mentioned, “I stay up for seeing him in courtroom after I assume my new place.”
Upon taking workplace in 2019, James promptly adopted by means of, filing a lawsuit that in the end led to a $454 million civil judgment towards Trump and his group for allegedly “overvaluing property” on mortgage purposes – regardless of industry-standard disclaimers advising lenders to conduct their very own valuations.
However regardless of all of James’ efforts to hurt him politically, Donald Trump received the presidency in a landslide in 2024. What occurred?
The reply lies not in partisanship, however in precept. Even average and apolitical Individuals had grown weary of Letitia James antics. They may sense a line had been crossed and that the equipment of presidency beneath James seemed extra like a political marketing campaign than a public service.
When authorities energy is misused to punish political adversaries, most Individuals instinctively see it as a betrayal of the nation’s founding spirit. To them, it resembles the ways of authoritarian regimes – not a free society.

As a result of America was based as a democracy on the ideas of equal justice beneath legislation, the weaponization of presidency companies for political achieve strikes on the very coronary heart of public belief. Whether or not it’s legislation enforcement, the courts, the IRS, or intelligence companies, their legitimacy rests on absolute neutrality.
The American Revolution itself was born out of resistance to arbitrary rule. Early Individuals chafed beneath the British Crown’s abuses – searches with out warrants, taxation with out illustration, and politically motivated crackdowns.
The Founders designed a constitutional republic with checks and balances exactly to stop the rise of centralized energy that may very well be wielded towards dissenters. That legacy nonetheless informs fashionable civic expectations to today.
That’s the reason so many Individuals welcomed the recent referral of mortgage fraud allegations towards Letitia James to the Division of Justice by the U.S. Federal Housing Finance Company (FHFA), and why information of an FBI investigation into her conduct has struck a chord.
First, the referral says that James fraudulently claimed a property in Norfolk, Virginia, as her “principal residence” on authorized paperwork associated to an influence of lawyer she executed to buy a house.
On the time, she was legally domiciled in Brooklyn, New York. The referral asserts that this false illustration enabled James to qualify for a mortgage beneath false pretenses and obtain extra favorable mortgage phrases. This data first got here to gentle in The Gateway Pundit article ‘Revealed: NY Attorney General Letitia James Declares Virginia Home Her Principal Residence’ by Sam Antar.
The second allegation facilities on a government-backed HAMP loan (Dwelling Inexpensive Modification Program) utility James made in 2011.
The criticism mirrors my article in The Gateway Pundit, ‘Huge Improvement: Is Letitia James Responsible of Mortgage Fraud?’ from March 18, 2025 and alleges that James misrepresented the variety of authorized items in her Brooklyn house constructing, stating it had fewer items than it truly did to qualify for a decreased rate of interest mortgage beneath the HAMP program James was not eligible for.
The applying was in the end accredited, and James obtained a positive 2.7% rate of interest with the federal government mortgage on the backs of American taxpayers. The referral additionally cites Letitia James’ unlawful scheme whereby she claimed to have married her personal father in a 1983 loan application to acquire decrease rates of interest.
At its core, the general public notion of Letitia James weaponization of presidency isn’t about celebration – it’s about precept. Most Individuals, no matter political allegiance, perceive that when energy is misused at this time towards one facet, it will probably simply as simply be turned towards them tomorrow.
Individuals wish to stay in a rustic the place justice is blind, not vengeful, and the place elections determine who governs, not partisan prosecutors. Ought to James in the end face prison prices, it’s going to ship a convincing message: justice have to be even-handed, and those that wield energy should accomplish that responsibly or be held accountable. That, greater than any partisan calculation, is why Individuals are cheering the FBI investigation into Letitia James.
Joel Gilbert, is a Los Angeles-based movie producer, and president of Highway 61 Entertainment. He’s on Twitter: @JoelSGilbert.