ADVERTISEMENT
The current case of alleged sexual abuse on the campus of the Nationwide College of Bogotá has sparked a profound and polarizing debate in Colombia. Statements by President Gustavo Petro, describing the incident as an «act of affection,» have brought about outrage and prompted reflection on the political management’s accountability in addressing gender-based violence.
Gustavo Petro es un pervertido y genera un profundo asco. Hace unos días defendía a Daniel Mendoza y lo describía como un “emancipador del amor”. Ahora publicó—y luego borró—que la violación de una mujer en la Universidad Nacional fue un “acto de amor”.
¡Asco de tipo!🤮 pic.twitter.com/Y61XMvZxe4
— Luis David Caro (@LuisDavidCaro) December 21, 2024
The Case Context
On December 19, 2024, an alleged sexual assault was reported on the campus of the Nationwide College throughout a nighttime occasion that concerned the consumption of psychoactive substances and group actions.
Preliminary experiences claimed a younger girl had been a sufferer of rape, prompting the fast intervention of college authorities and the launch of a proper investigation. Nonetheless, the sufferer later denied experiencing violence, complicating the preliminary narrative of the case.
Gustavo Petro calificó como “acto de amor” presunto caso de abuso sexual en la sede de la Universidad Nacional https://t.co/Ibrhz9i6mM
— HERSALZA (@neysaza) December 21, 2024
Gustavo Petro’s Controversial Statements
By his profile on the social media platform X (previously Twitter), President Petro questioned the interpretation of the occasion, stating it was a «consensual act of affection.» A very repugnant remark.
This outrageous assertion dismissed the preliminary accusations and, unsurprisingly, generated a wave of criticism from political, tutorial, and social sectors. College leaders, comparable to Rector Leopoldo Múnera, reaffirmed their dedication to reporting the case to the Lawyer Basic’s Workplace, emphasizing the necessity to make clear the details and guarantee justice.
Institutional Response
In its official assertion, the Nationwide College expressed «profound unhappiness» over the incident and reiterated its dedication to insurance policies stopping gender-based violence.
It was reported that the alleged perpetrators had been recognized and that investigations are progressing to make clear the details.
However, this case has highlighted the shortage of controls at campus occasions and the vulnerability of open areas inside the college.
A Broader Debate on Political Discourse
President Petro’s phrases have been seen as a type of revictimization and a minimization of a structural downside. His remark displays a scarcity of sensitivity towards gender-based violence points and sends a contradictory message in a rustic striving to advance girls’s rights.
In distinction, his supporters argue that his statements have been taken out of context and that the investigation outcomes must be awaited earlier than drawing definitive conclusions. After all, these are the identical leftists who push feminist ideologies, chanting «I do imagine you,» but now defend Petro’s repugnant remark. May the contradiction be any clearer?
President Gustavo Petro’s response to this grave incident reveals a bewildering lack of sensitivity and accountability from a pacesetter who, quite than understanding the gravity of sexual violence, minimizes victims’ struggling by labeling abuse as an «act of affection.»
This unlucky assertion not solely revictimizes those that have endured such assaults but additionally sends a harmful message about normalizing violence in a rustic the place femicides and sexual abuses are urgent points.
Past phrases, Petro’s authorities should embrace its position as a defender of human rights, demonstrating by means of actions that it’s dedicated to tackling this scourge with out ambiguity or absurd justifications.
Impunity and indifference towards circumstances of gender-based violence not solely erode belief in authorities but additionally perpetuate a cycle of injustice that Colombia can not afford to tolerate.
About The Creator
