New York Governor Kathy Hochul cares very deeply about local weather change. She lately signed a invoice that goals to fine fossil fuel companies $75 billion for supposed injury to the local weather.
In her private life nevertheless, she follows a special algorithm, naturally.
Hochul has spent a small fortune on personal jets. Doesn’t that sort of violate the entire ‘save the world from local weather change’ factor?
The New York Post reported:
Gov. Hochul, NY’s greatest climate-change booster, has spent $415K on personal jets: ‘It’s very wasteful’
She’s taking a troublesome line on fossil fuels — besides those she’s spewing.
Gov. Hochul — who lately authorized a controversial regulation that can drive oil, natural-gas and coal firms to pony up $75 billion for carbon emissions allegedly contributing to world warming — has taken not less than 30 flights aboard personal jets since 2021, state Board of Elections information present.
The $415,000 tab was picked up by her marketing campaign committee, information present.
“It’s very wasteful, particularly for an elected official. There isn’t any purpose why any elected official in New York must be taking a non-public jet. Practically all over the place in New York or upstate has a [commercial] airport that can take you wherever within the nation. New York is without doubt one of the most well-connected locations on the planet,” stated a neighborhood pilot skilled in personal aviation.
Hochul flew with two private-airline firms, Zephyr Jets and Apollo Jets, within the final 4 years. It’s unclear what the locations had been, however no flight price lower than $5,000 whereas her costliest was journey was billed Jan. 17 for $38,594.00, information present.
Is anybody shocked?
All the time the identical.
“The planet is on fireplace! Now do as I say, not as I do!”
— Mike Breslin, Ph.D. (@mikebreslin815) January 4, 2025
Guidelines for thee however not for me:
“She’s taking a troublesome line on fossil fuels — besides those she’s spewing.
Gov. Hochul — who lately authorized a controversial regulation that can drive oil, natural-gas and coal firms to pony up $75 billion for carbon emissions allegedly… pic.twitter.com/zigaq5aLpf— Steve Visitor (@SteveGuest) January 4, 2025
Isn’t it fascinating how the individuals who speak probably the most in regards to the significance of addressing local weather change by no means appear to stay by the principles they need to impose on everybody else?
