To the editor: To paraphrase a well-liked aphorism about males and remedy, it seems that younger individuals would relatively danger destroying total landscapes with nuclear waste than have much less electrical energy to energy the web. (“Has nuclear power entered a new era of acceptance amid global warming?” Nov. 18)
Even ignoring the “small however actual” probability of devastating nuclear meltdowns, why is there rising de-stigmatization across the inevitability of nuclear waste? Why are we assured that tons of radioactive materials sitting for 1,000-plus years in a mountain or below the Earth’s floor is not going to come again to hang-out us? Why are we prepared to danger individuals’s lives centuries into the longer term relatively than have an sincere reckoning with the energy-intensive and wasteful character of our lives proper now?
Waste is an element and parcel of any power manufacturing. Even one thing so simple as dashing water to energy a flour mill, or the solar to energy a house, comes with the waste of the supplies we use to harness, retailer and distribute that power. The truth is that “clear power” is a political assertion harnessed by power corporations to gasoline their very own monetary alternatives; it isn’t a scientific statement of actuality.
I’d advocate that youthful individuals receptive to nuclear power contemplate the seventh-generation precept, which calls on us to care concerning the wants of those that will stay nicely past our personal deaths.
Matthew Neel, Sherman Oaks
..
To the editor: I used to be very stunned to learn this nearly constructive article on nuclear power.
How can the Los Angeles space’s personal partial nuclear meltdown nonetheless be such a secret that it isn’t even talked about on this article? Don’t individuals know that the USA has a compensation plan for sick and deceased nuclear employees?
The location of the Santa Susana Discipline Laboratory close to Simi Valley is extremely contaminated; it had a partial nuclear meltdown in 1959 and extra accidents. Many former employees have been sickened or are lifeless, and sick kids have turned up within the space.
There’s nowhere within the nation to take the “spent” nuclear gasoline, so it’s saved on website. There’s additionally nice hazard from nuclear meltdowns.
Bonnie Klea, West Hills
The author is a former employee on the Santa Susana Discipline Laboratory.
..
To the editor: I believed the problem of nuclear energy was over.
Widespread renewable power strategies maintain not one of the risks related to nuclear and are cheaper. The price of nuclear is estimated to be nearly 4 occasions the price of photo voltaic.
The waste situation is sort of insurmountable, because the radioactive half-life of the fabric is anyplace from 30 years to greater than 1 million years. Photo voltaic panels could have poisonous chemical compounds, however they don’t seem to be radioactive for generations. And I’ve by no means heard of a photo voltaic farm exploding and making a 1,000-square-mile exclusion zone, as with Chernobyl.
Philip Chipman, Costa Mesa
