Visitor put up by Jerome Corsi, Ph.D.
As reported yesterday, a Fulton County Superior Court Judge has ruled that county election officers should certify vote counts within the 2024 election even when they think voter fraud or errors. Choose Robert McBurney insisted in his order that disputes over voter or election fraud needs to be settled in courtroom.
This ruling ignores the problem dozens of lawsuits have confronted difficult the 2024 election. The truth is that, as soon as an election is licensed, the bar for difficult alleged fraud turns into virtually insurmountably excessive. Judges have a simple out by ruling that plaintiffs alleging fraud in an authorized election lack standing to have their circumstances heard.
Choose McBurney’s order is in direct distinction with a latest Federal District Courtroom decide’s opinion.
On September 27, 2024, Federal District Courtroom Choose Michael T. Liburdi rendered a choice in American Encore v. Adrian Fontes that upheld the appropriate of a county supervisor to refuse to certify an election primarily based on suspected fraud. In 2022, county supervisors in Cochise County, Arizona, refused to certify the mid-term election as a result of they suspected fraud. Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes invoked an Arizona State Board of Elections that allowed Fontes to disregard Cochise County in a last depend to certify the election in Arizona.
Choose Liburdi dominated that by ignoring Cochise County, Fontes had violated the Fourteenth Modification to the Structure by disenfranchising the voters of that county. Choose Liburdi characterised the Arizona Board of Elections rule as “most likely unprecedented within the historical past of the US” as a result of it “offers the Secretary of State almost carte blanche authority to disenfranchise the ballots of doubtless thousands and thousands of People.”
Whereas leftist judges appear decided to allow election officers to behave, making election fraud simpler to commit with out legal penalties, at the very least one courtroom has just lately dominated that may enable conscientious county supervisors to conduct investigations of potential fraud earlier than being compelled to certify a stolen election. Choose Liburdi’s resolution empowers county supervisors to cease the push to certify that has turn into an all too obvious important a part of mail-in poll fraud.
If a state supervisor can’t problem a voter depend due to suspected voter or election fraud, what’s the level of getting state supervisors certifying elections? Choose McBurney’s order reduces the county certification of an election to a rubber-stamp course of that encourages criminals to proceed with out worry their unlawful election schemes will ever be severely investigated or contested.
Choose Liburdi’s ruling is a bulwark in opposition to secret algorithms within the state voter databases that create a pool of hidden “non-existent voters.” Past simply creating “non-existent voters,” the cryptographic algorithms assign authentic state voter IDs to the “non-existent voters.” This final step permits the legal perpetrators to vote these “non-existent voters” as apparently “authorized” mail-in votes in what might be adequate portions to steal in any other case dropping elections.
State election boards don’t conduct subject canvassing efforts to confirm that mail-in voters exist, affirm that they reside on the registered addresses, or confirm that they’re legally certified to vote. This failure permits legal perpetrators to interject a cryptographic algorithm scheme into the database that enables the perpetrators to create “non-existent voters.”
The one option to tackle the issue of those phantom voters is to halt certification and analyze the database. Nevertheless, Fontes’s “rush-rush” efforts to certify the 2022 mid-term election in Arizona recommend the Arizona Board of Election ruling was designed to forestall investigation and detection of mail-in poll fraud..
Neither is this a hypothetical danger. To this point, as reported on GodsFiveStones.com, pc graphics skilled Andrew Paquette, Ph.D. has discovered algorithms within the boards of elections’ official voter registration lists of the next states: New York, Ohio, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania with experiences on algorithms discovered Texas, and New Jersey in progress. Dr. Paquette is now inspecting the state voter rolls in Arizona and Georgia.
Choose Liburdi’s ruling signifies that a county the place an algorithm is discovered might safely refuse to certify its outcomes on the suspicion that phantom voter fraud affected election outcomes in that county.
Likewise, a candidate who misplaced a detailed election after a late surge in mail-in ballots for the candidate’s opponent might have a authentic argument that an algorithm was utilized in an election fraud scheme designed to profit the opponent’s political celebration.
By analogy, if an investigation finds a on line casino has been utilizing marked playing cards on the “21” tables, it will be unimaginable to show that any gambler ever had legitimately misplaced a hand. In the identical means, if an algorithm that can be utilized to cheat is current in a voter registration database, it’s unimaginable to find out an sincere final result for that election.
Slowing down certification, even in a single county, might acquire the time wanted to conduct a forensic examination to find out if the algorithm was used to set off the mail-in votes within the objecting county and the way lots of the mail-in ballots solid in that county have been fraudulent.
In conclusion, beneath Choose Liburdi’s ruling, all it might take to reveal election fraud in 2024 ought to the voting counting patterns seen within the 2020 election be repeated on this election is for one county in a battleground state to refuse to certify the election.
GodsFiveStones.com is a tax-deductible 501(c)3 basis created by Jerome R. Corsi, Ph.D., and Karladine Graves, M.D., managed by Capstone Legacy Foundation.
