Palantir co-founder Peter Thiel just lately met with New York Occasions columnist Ross Douthat to debate many matters, together with innovation, life extension know-how, the antichrist, and transhumanism.
The subject of transhumanism was introduced up when Douthat requested Thiel, “Ought to the human race survive?”
Thiel responded, “Sure. However I additionally would really like us to radically remedy these issues. And so it’s all the time, I don’t know, yeah — transhumanism.”
The co-founder of Palantir added, “The perfect was this radical transformation the place your human, pure physique will get reworked into an immortal physique.”
He later acknowledged that transgenderism doesn’t go far sufficient in terms of altering one’s physique and shared, “We would like greater than cross-dressing or altering your intercourse organs. We would like you to have the ability to change your coronary heart and alter your thoughts and alter your entire physique.”
WATCH:
I utterly agree with Thiel. In fact we need to enhance ourselves. In fact we need to obtain mastery over our flesh. In fact we need to advance thus far that someday we would not be recognizable as human. pic.twitter.com/wvcLUihlIs
— Hunter Ash (@ArtemisConsort) June 29, 2025
In case you’re unfamiliar with transhumanism, it’s an ideology that promotes utilizing know-how and science to boost human capabilities.
Primarily, transhumanists welcome an period the place people merge with machines.
Later within the interview, Thiel and Douthat focus on the antichrist.
Thiel shared that “The way in which the Antichrist would take over the world is you speak about Armageddon nonstop. You speak about existential danger nonstop, and that is what you should regulate.”
The New York Times offered a transcript:
Douthat: You’ve gotten been giving talks just lately concerning the idea of the Antichrist, which is a Christian idea, an apocalyptic idea. What does that imply to you? What’s the Antichrist?
Thiel: All proper. Properly, I might speak about it for a very long time. I believe there’s all the time a query of how we articulate a few of these existential dangers, among the challenges we now have, they usually’re all framed on this form of runaway dystopian science textual content. There’s a danger of nuclear warfare, there’s a danger of environmental catastrophe. Perhaps one thing particular, like local weather change, though there are many different ones we’ve give you. There’s a danger of bioweapons. You’ve gotten all of the totally different sci-fi situations. Clearly, there are particular forms of dangers with A.I.
Thiel: However I all the time assume that if we’re going to have this body of speaking about existential dangers, maybe we must also speak concerning the danger of one other kind of a foul singularity, which I might describe because the one-world totalitarian state. As a result of I might say the default political answer folks have for all these existential dangers is one-world governance. What do you do about nuclear weapons? Now we have a United Nations with actual enamel that controls them, they usually’re managed by a global political order. After which one thing like that is additionally: What will we do about A.I.? And we want world compute governance. We want a one-world authorities to regulate all of the computer systems, log each single keystroke, to verify folks don’t program a harmful A.I. And I’ve been questioning whether or not that’s going from the frying pan into the hearth.
Thiel: The atheist philosophical framing is “One World or None.” That was a brief movie that was put out by the Federation of American Scientists within the late ’40s. It begins with the nuclear bomb blowing up the world, and clearly, you want a one-world authorities to cease it — one world or none. And the Christian framing, which in some methods is similar query, is: Antichrist or Armageddon? You’ve gotten the one-world state of the Antichrist, or we’re sleepwalking towards Armageddon. “One world or none,” “Antichrist or Armageddon,” on one degree, are the identical query.
Thiel: It’s a really implausible plot gap. However I believe we now have a solution to this plot gap. The way in which the Antichrist would take over the world is you speak about Armageddon nonstop. You speak about existential danger nonstop, and that is what you should regulate. It’s the alternative of the image of Baconian science from the seventeenth, 18th century, the place the Antichrist is like some evil tech genius, evil scientist who invents this machine to take over the world. Individuals are manner too scared for that.
Thiel: In our world, the factor that has political resonance is the alternative. The factor that has political resonance is: We have to cease science, we have to simply say “cease” to this. And that is the place, within the seventeenth century, I can think about a Dr. Strangelove, Edward Teller-type particular person taking up the world. In our world, it’s much more prone to be Greta Thunberg.
WATCH:
Peter Thiel is requested why he’s not the Antichrist he warns about if he’s actively constructing authoritarian rule through navy and surveillance applied sciences
“These are totally different situations…clearly I don’t assume that that’s what I’m doing” pic.twitter.com/cDEdAW1Eqs
— HOT SPOT (@HotSpotHotSpot) June 27, 2025
You possibly can watch the complete interview under:
