Subsequent week, the Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs protection will current its case, maybe in as little as two days, which might sign that they’re optimistic about his acquittal.
Some papers protecting the trial additionally appear to be leaning this manner, with the Day by day Mail, for instance, saying that the protection scored a ‘win’ when witness Brendan Paul stated that the ladies had been NOT compelled into the notorious freak-offs.
Nevertheless it’s much less easy than that: Brendan Paul can be the witness who admitted bringing medicine to Diddy on a number of events, solely to show round and say he was NOT the rapper’s ‘drug mule’.
So, perhaps it’s semantics with Brendan Paul.
By now, each the jury and the world have seen the photographs of the beating that Diddy inflicted on Cassie Ventura in a Resort as she was attempting to flee a ‘freak-off’ intercourse marathon. Speak about consent!
That’s not to recommend that the high-octane Protection workforce led by Mark Agnifilo hasn’t poked holes on some features of a few of the testimonies.
However in the long run, it is going to about be the combination impact: has the prosecution proved the racketeering prices?
The disgraced rap mogul is charged with utilizing his fame, his fortune, and (importantly) his corporations to additional a felony racket that exploited and intercourse trafficked girls (and male escorts) by way of violence, threats, or financial leverage.
I discover a few of the content material within the WSJ article beneath fairly on level.
Wall Street Journal reported:
“Former federal prosecutor Maria Cruz Melendez stated the federal government had successfully proven that a few of Combs’s former employees aided him in procuring medicine, paying bribes and compensating escorts—a key a part of a racketeering conspiracy cost in opposition to him. Ventura, a singer who was as soon as signed to Combs’s music label Dangerous Boy Information, additionally supplied a compelling account, detailing Combs’s hair-trigger mood and the management he had over her music profession and funds, stated Cruz Melendez, a accomplice at legislation agency Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom.”
This different bit can be related:
“Brian Klein, a former federal prosecutor and accomplice at legislation agency Waymaker, stated the protection workforce up to now has been profitable in offering further context to the prosecution’s allegations.
‘The protection is working to color an image for the jury that it is a collection of long-term relationships and, whereas the info is likely to be disturbing, they don’t quantity to intercourse trafficking’, he stated.”

However let’s learn once more what former prosecutor Melendez stated: “the federal government had successfully proven that a few of Combs’s former employees aided him in procuring medicine, paying bribes and compensating escorts—a key a part of a racketeering conspiracy cost in opposition to him.”
There’s no denying his violence in opposition to girls he ‘managed’ (prosecution) or was merely ‘concerned with’ (protection).
In addition to Brendan Paul, a number of different assistants and safety personnel had been ordered to ‘convey’ or ‘transport’ medicine to him.
The large work of scheduling and paying for the a number of male escorts was additionally handled Diddy’s workers or lovers.
It has been clearly established that Diddy and safety personnel acted in live performance to bribe the safety guard from the Resort to provide them ‘the one copy’ of the footage of Diddy beating Cassie.
A lot much less nicely established – however doubtlessly credible – is the accusation that Diddy and his ‘crew’ firebombed Child Cudi’s automotive and broke into his home for sleeping with Cassie.
One other worker additionally instructed the jury about being forcibly rushed right into a automotive the place a drugged and armed Diddy was heading to a nightclub to confront a rival.
That is only a pattern of the compelling testimony – to not point out Cassie Ventura and ‘Jane’ who gave lengthy, grueling, very uncomfortable however extremely consequential accounts of Diddy’s alleged crimes.
So we’ll must see the place the boldness from Diddy’s protection is stemming from, and whether or not it’s justified.
Learn extra: