The high-stakes, high-profile prison trial of disgraced rap mogul Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs is coming to the purpose when prosecution will relaxation their case.
However the trial has been engulfed by juror issues, and at present (17), prison leaks of knowledge put below seal have left the presiding Choose livid.
The Independent reported:
“Tuesday’s proceedings obtained off to a scorching begin with Choose Arun Subramanian scolding each the protection and prosecution after an article was printed with data that was below seal. He warned either side that they may face penalties in the event that they continued.”
IX. Diddy Trial — JUDGE FURIOUS OVER LEAK
Choose Subramanian lashed out at legal professionals from either side this morning after a sealed Friday continuing appeared in a media report.
“Properly somebody is mendacity,” he mentioned, warning that this was a flagrant violation of courtroom orders.#DiddyTrial…
— Gen Simply Regulation (@genjustlaw) June 17, 2025
X. Diddy Trial — CONTEMPT ON THE TABLE
Choose Subramanian warned the courtroom that violators might be punished, probably with prison contempt or sanctions.
He confirmed: “I’ll be investigating this.”
Pressure is excessive — and somebody inside that sealed listening to could face critical… pic.twitter.com/s1tohkKQXg
— Gen Simply Regulation (@genjustlaw) June 17, 2025
‘There’s nothing the juror can say at this level that may put the genie again within the bottle and restore his credibility.’ Choose Subramanian
Yesterday, ‘Juror 6’ was dismissed for mendacity throughout ‘voir dire’ to enter the panel.
Now, there’s one other concern with the destiny of one other juror, ‘who might need spoken improperly concerning the case’.
The prosecution is ready to wrap up its case by Wednesday.
Fox News reported:
“In a letter filed by the federal government on Monday, the U.S. Legal professional’s Workplace famous it doesn’t oppose further fact-finding with a second juror because of attainable communications with a former colleague relating to jury service.”
The protection argues that, because the courtroom eliminated ‘6’ from the case, this second juror also needs to be excused.
Prosecution disagrees with ‘linking the problems’, however are open to additional questioning of the second juror.
Learn extra:
