Seattle and Boeing have been collectively for many years till Chicago got here alongside. However after the corporate moved its headquarters from a cloudy metropolis to a windy one, it struggled.
Was it us? The deep-dish pizza and Italian beef? The continuing wait for an additional Tremendous Bowl title?
As this iconic aerospace big tries to regain altitude after one more turbulent stretch, it’s truthful to ask if its transfer to Chicago in 2001 put it on the incorrect course altogether.
When then-Mayor Richard M. Daley introduced that town had received a bidding contest for Boeing’s headquarters, Tribune editorial web page joined within the celebration. The corporate bought over $60 million in public incentives for transferring its boardroom to the Loop. Chicago bought bragging rights.
The transfer made sense to us on the time. Chicago gave Boeing’s management staff the handy, centralized transportation hub they have been lacking within the Pacific Northwest. Settling in a extra world metropolis with a financially savvy workforce was broadly thought of a plus as nicely. Shifting out of Seattle additionally put virtually 2,000 miles between the corporate’s high brass and its restive unions, which could have been one of many greatest sights from the corner-office viewpoint.
Because it turned out, although, the transfer appears to have undermined an engineering-friendly tradition centered on design, security and high quality. On reflection, separating from the vital mass of aerospace specialists in Seattle remoted the corporate’s leaders from the guts of their enterprise.
Aside from the transfer to Chicago, the opposite “X issue” in that transformation was Boeing’s 1997 acquisition of McDonnell Douglas, an organization higher identified for monetary engineering than the aerospace sort. Its priorities have been quarterly earnings and returning cash to Wall Avenue shareholders — priorities Boeing embraced after the deal closed, appointing a string of chief govt officers who collected huge paychecks however reduce corners in making planes.
One consequence of this alteration was the choice to improve a preferred passenger jet as a substitute of designing a brand new one with all the newest advances, because the perfectionists at old-school Boeing little doubt would have most well-liked. Extending the lifetime of its workhorse 737s helped Boeing’s backside line within the quick run. Over time, that strategy opened the corporate to critical issues, together with the infamous 737 MAX crashes.
In October 2018, this newly modified model of the outdated 737 jetliner crashed close to Indonesia. 5 months later, one other new 737 MAX crashed in Ethiopia. Boeing had reconfigured the MAX mannequin with greater engines that affected its aerodynamics, and federal regulators had given the corporate an excessive amount of management over certifying the brand new design. A defective flight-control system pressured down the 2 planes regardless of their pilots’ determined efforts to maintain them aloft, killing a mixed 346 aboard.
As a substitute of taking duty, the corporate reportedly tried accountable the international airways and resisted grounding its MAX fleet within the curiosity of security. Then-CEO Dennis Muilenburg spouted insincere baloney about security being a core worth, till he was lastly ousted by a board that paid him off with a $62 million exit bundle.
Within the waning days of the primary administration of President Donald Trump, Boeing reached a settlement with the Justice Division that protected it from prosecution over the MAX crashes. Shortly after, in 2022, the corporate moved from Chicago to Arlington, Va., nearer to its No. 1 buyer: Uncle Sam.
Final 12 months introduced one other stunning security gaffe, when a door panel blew off in midair from a 737 MAX 9 operated by Alaska Airways. A couple of months later, federal prosecutors decided that Boeing had violated its deferred prosecution deal by failing to implement a compliance and ethics program.
In response, Boeing agreed to plead responsible to prison fraud, however a federal choose in Texas rejected the plea deal as a result of it included variety objectives. Now, with Trump again in energy, Boeing seems more likely to obtain a lighter settlement that avoids a prison plea. Throughout a latest Center East journey, Trump additionally publicly promoted Boeing jets — a reminder of the corporate’s political clout and shut ties to its largest buyer: the U.S. authorities.
Cozying as much as a pro-defense administration could also be giving Boeing’s inventory a lift, nevertheless it received’t restore public belief or stop future failures.
Boeing lately revealed the unhappy outcomes of an all-employee survey, its first in years. Most Boeing staff stated they lack religion in senior management, and barely 1 / 4 advocate the corporate as place to work. That’s a giant comedown from the outdated days.
Nonetheless, Boeing inventory has bounced again strongly this 12 months and its newish CEO, Kelly Ortberg, says he’s placing the corporate’s issues behind it. Earlier this month, Ortberg advised Wall Avenue that he’s introducing “new values and behaviors to your entire group,” vowing to “seize the second to make the required modifications inside the firm.”
Ortberg additionally reportedly purchased a home in Seattle final 12 months, which we contemplate a optimistic step.
If Boeing was going to maneuver the headquarters anyplace from Chicago, and if it was critical about rebuilding its tradition, it in all probability ought to have moved again to Seattle. Nonetheless, its time right here left a optimistic mark: Boeing supported civic establishments, employed native expertise and helped elevate Chicago’s stature as a middle for world enterprise.
©2025 Chicago Tribune. Go to at chicagotribune.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
