The Division of Justice has opened an investigation into the College of Virginia for discriminating towards college students based mostly on the intolerant rules of range, fairness, and inclusion.
The DOJ confirmed to America First Legal on Thursday that it’s launched an investigation into how UVA “is actively working packages that discriminate based mostly on race, intercourse, ethnicity, nationwide origin, and different impermissible, immutable traits,” in keeping with AFL.
The varsity has allegedly been discriminating based mostly on DEI regardless of a Supreme Court ruling towards affirmative motion and an government order from President Donald Trump banning race-based faculty admissions.
For 3 years, AFL has fought relentlessly to dismantle DEI.
This week, President Trump issued an government order ending unlawful discrimination and restoring merit-based alternative for all Individuals.
This marks the start of the tip of DEI. pic.twitter.com/nNZjsBWDIF
— America First Authorized (@America1stLegal) January 22, 2025
However in keeping with AFL counsel Megan Redshaw, it’s not a lot that the college has been blatantly persevering with its DEI practices within the face of those rulings because it that the college has covertly rebranded all of its discriminatory packages in an try to seem DEI-free.
“UVA has not dismantled its DEI framework — it has merely rebranded it to evade authorized scrutiny,” Redshaw defined in a press release.
“What the legislation prohibits, UVA merely renamed,” she added.
The DOJ’s determination to launch an investigation was reportedly prompted by a letter despatched by AFL to the division earlier within the month, detailing quite a few examples of this rebranding.
The letter famous, for instance, that UVA’s Darden College of Enterprise nonetheless “retains diversity-focused scholarships, programming, and a Chief Variety Officer who oversees strategic implementation.”
“Darden additionally companions with exterior organizations to supply scholarships that favor college students based mostly on impermissible traits,” the letter continued.
In the meantime, the college retained many DEI-linked positions however simply renamed them.
Take the “Affiliate Director of World Variety, Fairness and Inclusion,” for instance. The place was merely renamed to “Affiliate Director, World Recruiting.”
/6 Jannatul Pramanik was UVA’s “Affiliate Director of World Variety, Fairness and Inclusion.” After the March 7 vote to dismantle DEI, UVA merely renamed her “Affiliate Director, World Recruiting.”
The job? Nonetheless DEI.
The networks? Nonetheless DEI.
⁰The mission? Nonetheless DEI. pic.twitter.com/3BzFQaEymk— America First Authorized (@America1stLegal) May 24, 2025
The March 7 vote talked about within the AFL tweet above referenced a call by UVA’s Board of Guests to dissolve the college’s DEI workplace.
“The administration will assessment the capabilities of the workplace, and all personnel and packages which can be permissible underneath state and federal legislation can be transferred inside the College, inside 30 days,” the college stated on the time, as reported by UVA Magazine.
The letter written by AFL to the DOJ famous that regardless of the vote, “there is no such thing as a public indication UVA responded to the Board of Guests inside the 30-day window, elevating questions in regards to the College’s noncompliance and transparency.”
DEI is an illiberal philosophy that seeks to make up for previous discrimination towards sure races/teams by making use of trendy discrimination towards all people else.
Some of the infamous types of DEI is affirmative action, which requires purposefully discriminating towards Asian and white college students to artificially prop up black and Latino college students.
This text appeared initially on The Western Journal.
