The Baltic international locations —Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania— have signed an settlement to extend their protection spending to five% of their Gross Home Product (GDP) beginning in 2026.
This dedication, formalized on the Amari Air Base in Estonia on Could 23, 2025, responds each to rising geopolitical tensions with Russia and to calls for from U.S. President Donald Trump for NATO allies to extend their army investments.
The choice by the Baltic international locations stems from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania have intensified their efforts to strengthen their protection capabilities.
Their geographic proximity to Russia and their historical past as former Soviet republics make them a essential NATO flank. In response to Estonian Protection Minister Hanno Pevkur, the present safety state of affairs calls for a big enhance in army spending— a stance supported by the leaders of the three international locations through the Amari assembly.
In recent times, the Baltics have noticed an increase in Russian actions, together with airspace incursions, army workouts close to their borders, and hybrid operations comparable to cyberattacks and disinformation campaigns.
In 2024, Lithuanian President Gitanas Nausėda warned concerning the rise in “Russian sabotage on NATO territories,” highlighting the necessity for a coordinated response. This context has led the Baltics to prioritize deterrence, with investments in superior methods like HIMARS rockets and air protection methods.
The Amari settlement additionally displays strain from america, NATO’s main energy, for its allies to achieve a 5% of GDP army spending degree.
This demand, pushed by the Trump administration, has sparked debate throughout the Alliance, as NATO’s present threshold is 2% of GDP— a degree many international locations have but to fulfill.
The Baltics, nevertheless, already far exceed this minimal. In 2022, Lithuania allotted 2.47%, Estonia 2.12%, and Latvia 2.07% of their GDP to protection, in line with NATO knowledge. In 2024, Estonia introduced plans to achieve 3.7% by 2026, whereas Lithuania goals for a 5% to six% vary between 2026 and 2030. Latvia, for its half, determined in Could 2025 to lift its spending to five%, reallocating sources and optimizing authorities effectivity.
Elevating protection spending to five% of GDP implies a big monetary effort. In Latvia, Prime Minister Evika Siliņa famous that finances cuts, new income sources, and presumably the next deficit can be required.
Estonia, in line with its Prime Minister Kristen Michal, plans to fund the rise with out new taxes, utilizing EU funds, cuts within the public sector, and strategic borrowing. Lithuania, which has already dedicated 0.25% of its GDP to army assist for Ukraine, seeks to stability its protection ambitions with financial stability.
These investments are usually not targeted solely on conventional weaponry. The Baltics are strengthening their capabilities in cybersecurity, digital protection, and army mobility.
For instance, Latvia will allocate 42% of its 2025 protection finances to creating army capabilities, together with HIMARS methods and air defenses.
As well as, the three international locations are advancing the synchronization of their energy grids with continental Europe, a mission to be accomplished by February 2025 to scale back vitality dependence on Russia.
Whereas the Baltics lead with their 5% dedication, NATO exhibits a transparent divide. International locations like Poland— which is able to allocate 4.12% of its GDP in 2025— and Lithuania, with plans to achieve 6%, distinction with nations like Spain, which barely reaches 1.09%.
International locations nearer to Russia prioritize conventional protection, whereas others, comparable to Spain, focus their efforts on cybersecurity and catastrophe prevention.
The Amari assembly additionally served to arrange for the NATO summit in The Hague in June 2025, the place protection spending can be a central concern. The Baltics will advocate for a widespread enhance in army budgets, supporting earlier proposals like Poland’s to lift NATO’s minimal to three%.
A query arises: Is it sustainable for small economies like Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania to imagine such excessive army spending? The reallocation of sources and borrowing may jeopardize important providers like healthcare, training, or pensions, affecting their residents.
The Baltic technique highlights the necessity for a extra coordinated European strategy, the place the burden of protection doesn’t fall disproportionately on the smallest and most susceptible nations.
It’s true that in the present day’s threats are more and more advanced— from cyberattacks to disinformation— however NATO’s actual power will rely not solely on how a lot is spent, however on how investments are made and the way safety priorities are balanced with social wants.
About The Creator
