In a latest interview that has stirred up social media, Boonie Blue, a girl who defines herself as empowered, tried to justify hypersexualization and promiscuity as instruments of feminine liberation. Her statements, removed from inspiring respect or admiration, reveal the damaging path through which fashionable feminism has led many younger girls: towards ethical confusion, a lack of dignity, and the commodification of their our bodies.
In Blue’s personal phrases:
“Sure, it’s empowering for ladies, not only for me, however for different girls. Most of them—those who aren’t lazy.”
Based on this imaginative and prescient, the “empowered” lady shouldn’t be somebody who research, works laborious, or builds a robust household. No. On this narrative, empowerment means capitalizing on the sexualization of the feminine physique to earn a living, as if that have been the height of ladies’s progress.
Management… or Submission in Disguise?
Blue claims that by collaborating within the hypersexualization of herself via platforms like OnlyFans, she is in management. She says she chooses what to point out, tips on how to handle her picture, and in her personal phrases:
“I’m making a living with it… I’m in management and, even after I’m not in management, I like it.”
This contradiction exposes a disturbing fact: this isn’t empowerment—it’s self-deception. When a girl says she loves being uncontrolled, she is admitting her give up to a tradition that strips her of her intrinsic price and reduces her to a visible commodity.
This is identical model of feminism that criticizes the objectification of ladies in media—however celebrates it when it’s labeled as “freedom” or “self-expression.”
Ethical Collapse Disguised as Empowerment
Maybe probably the most unsettling second of the interview got here when Boonie Blue overtly spoke of her excessive promiscuity:
“Why do you suppose sleeping with 1,000 males was one thing essential to do? Is there some level you’re making an attempt to show?”
One would possibly count on this query to be a critique. However no—it’s posed naturally, as if it have been a badge of honor, a revolutionary act, when in actuality it displays a deep id and values disaster.
Does this actually characterize all girls? Has the ladies’s rights motion been diminished to promoting one’s physique for clicks, views, and subscriptions?
Selective Feminism: Who Will get to Determine What’s Empowering?
In yet one more instance of the ethical elitism of the left, Boonie Blue throws a veiled judgment at girls who don’t observe her path:
“It’s empowering for those who aren’t lazy.”
So now, a girl who chooses to not hypersexualize herself is “lazy”? The mom elevating youngsters, the younger lady finding out drugs, the loyal spouse caring for her residence and group—are these girls with out ambition?
This rhetoric shouldn’t be solely offensive; it’s harmful for a complete technology of younger folks searching for steerage, function fashions, and function.
What Actual Feminism Used to Imply
True feminism—the sort that fought for the proper to vote, for equal job alternatives, for respect for motherhood and feminine dignity—has been hijacked by a motion that promotes self-destruction disguised as freedom.
Boonie Blue doesn’t characterize all girls. She represents a loud minority applauded by progressive elites, however rejected by tens of millions of moms, daughters, and grandmothers who perceive {that a} lady’s worth shouldn’t be measured by what number of males need her or what number of {dollars} she earns by exhibiting her physique, however by her character, her power, her knowledge, and her love.
What Sort of Society Do We Wish to Construct?
The US must rebuild its values. It wants to guard girls’s dignity, not rejoice it when it’s degraded. And it wants leaders—not influencers—who train ladies that their our bodies are usually not commodities.
Common tradition has glamorized the vulgar. However not all the pieces that glitters is gold.
