To the editor: If the Supreme Courtroom justices determine to override the Institution Clause of the first Modification of the Structure, the query then turns into: Which church will run the colleges? Or temple, mosque, gurdwara, wat or basadi (“Supreme Court may allow church-run, publicly funded charter schools across the nation,” April 30)?
The founding fathers correctly didn’t set up a state faith as a result of historical past exhibits us the constraints and divisiveness that come up when politics and faith are combined collectively. And now the Supreme Courtroom needs to violate their needs and open up a Pandora’s field of faith into our public faculties.
Bob Hoffman, Lengthy Seashore
..
To the editor: So the Catholic majority on the Supreme Courtroom seems to favor public funding of non secular constitution faculties. I simply can’t wait to listen to how they will react when Hasidic faculties apply for funding their Torah-based research with minimal conventional educational lessons. And I’m certain they are going to welcome madrasas as properly. Watch out for what you would like for, SCOTUS.
Barbara Rosen, Fullerton
..
To the editor: If the conservatives on the Supreme Courtroom give the OK for tax-exempt church buildings to have us taxpayers pay for spiritual faculties, does that imply that the legislation might be modified and all church buildings can now be taxed? Shouldn’t have the ability to have it each methods.
Fred Mandel, Encino
..
To the editor: Why is the Supreme Courtroom even contemplating the funding of non secular constitution faculties with taxpayer {dollars}? We needs to be selling and funding science and math faculties to compete with China and different nations. Will spiritual research develop new medicines and remedy most cancers, enhance agriculture manufacturing to feed the poor or save the planet from local weather change?
Larry Naritomi, Monterey Park
