Visitor publish by Joe Hoft at JoeHoft.com – republished with permission.
Lawyer Peter Ticktin filed an Amicus Curiae Transient of American Rights Alliance in assist of Habeas Corpus Petition of Defendant Tina Peters.
President Trump’s buddy and former college mate, Peter Ticktin, filed a quick in assist of Tina Peters in Colorado yesterday.
Tina Peters filed for a Writ in Habeas Corpus difficult her present incarceration again in February.
Ticktin’s transient helps Peters and her place. Right here is an introductory paragraph from the transient:
The Defendant Tina Peters has a broad-based enchantment pending to the Colorado Courtroom of Appeals but in addition because of extreme well being issues and the injustice of detention has filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition for launch from incarceration – and thereby entry to needed medical care – pending her enchantment on the principle matters. The violation of her civil rights and constitutional rights assist habeas reduction of launch pending the end result of all appeals.
Peter then shares the next:
Nothing says that there was one thing unsuitable with the presidential election held on November 3, 2020, greater than the prosecution of those that tried to make sure that the election was honest and correct by utilizing the prison legislation to silence whistleblowers and by destroying proof beginning on round April 30, 2021.
Tina Peters has been prosecuted for exposing prison misconduct of different Colorado officers – whether or not she supposed that on the time or not. The Colorado Lawyer Common is even responsible of the now well-known 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c) – obstruction of an official continuing – in addition to tried destruction of proof (tried in Peters’ district, however certainly accomplished in different elements of Colorado)…
…Tina Peters’ “crime” was to protect a replica of the digital election information previous to the alteration of the software program and database. She organized a professional skilled to supervise the purported software program “improve” mandated by the Secretary of State that might have erased election information in violation of 52 U.S.C. §20701.
The substantive controversies on the coronary heart of her state prosecution middle on Ms. Peters’ authorized obligation to protect election information and information, each beneath State and Federal necessities, and the truth that Federal legal guidelines that mandated Peters’ heroic and protecting habits pre-empted the State legislation beneath the U.S. Structure’s Supremacy Clause. All judges contemplating this matter ought to recall the Supremacy Clause’s precise wording, which explicitly instructions “and the Judges in each State shall be certain thereby.”
Right here is the transient:
45 2025-05-02 Amicus Curiae Brief of American Rights Alliance in Support of Habeas Corpus Petition of Defen… by Joe Ho
God shield Tina Peters and save her from this wickedness.
