This author is not the one one who feels Nikola Jokic and Shai Gilgeous-Alexander ought to be named NBA co-MVPs this season. Draymond Inexperienced can be behind the concept.
On the newest “Draymond Green Show,” the Warriors star defined why SGA and Jokic should share the consideration. Inexperienced felt that Jokic, a three-time MVP, might be robbed of a fourth award attributable to voter fatigue, evaluating the situation to LeBron James’ peak years.
“‘Bron ought to have like six or seven MVPs, however folks get tired of greatness,” Inexperienced mentioned. “…If Joker was having his this 12 months and by no means received MVP, he’d undoubtedly be MVP. However as a result of folks have grown accustomed to him averaging these numbers, you get a bump down. In saying that, it is also exhausting to disclaim Shai.”
Inexperienced then urged the NBA to kind a committee the place voters might come collectively to make sure Jokic and SGA share the award. The defensive ace cited the flawed “voting system” since every voter has their distinctive standards for choosing the recipient of the Michael Jordan Trophy.
“Each guys are deserving,” Inexperienced burdened. “…I often take a tough stance, however I want there was a committee and the voting was completely different as a result of these guys could be co-MVPs.”
In conclusion, Inexperienced famous that if Jokic had been to be denied the award, voters would remorse their resolution a decade later for not rewarding a participant who averaged a triple-double and was among the many high three in factors (29.1), rebounds (12.8) and assists (10.3) — a feat not achieved since Wilt Chamberlain in 1967-68.
Final 12 months, Jokic beat SGA (79-15) in first-place votes for MVP. The closest MVP race of the twenty first century occurred in 2004-05 when Steve Nash received 65 first-place votes over Shaquille O’Neal’s 58. One other shut race noticed Tim Duncan edge out Jason Kidd by just 12 first-place votes in 2001-02. It should not come as a shock if this 12 months’s last tally will likely be as tantalizingly shut.
